Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes Recused by Law on Three (3) Cases — Yet Continues to Obstruct Justice in Multiple Federal Civil Rights Cases

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.

Ask ChatGPT

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed with Ninth Circuit — Treason from the Bench: How Judge Otis D. Wright II Denied Due Process, Obstructed Federal Jurisdiction, and Committed Fraud Upon the Court

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust, Wealth

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.