Discover the unstoppable power of unrebutted affidavits — the most overlooked yet decisive weapon in law. This guide proves that under FRCP, CFR, and binding precedent, unrebutted affidavits stand as admitted truth and demand judgment by law. When judges ignore them, they abandon jurisdiction, immunity, and lawful authority — exposing themselves as private actors under the Clearfield Doctrine. Master the rules, maxims, and case law that transform silence into default and default into judgment. Perfect for anyone seeking to enforce rights with precision, finality, and commercial leverage.
Discover the shocking truth behind America’s hidden transformation. Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 exposes how the Judicial Improvements Act quietly dismantled constitutional courts and replaced them with corporate administrative tribunals. Judges who were once independent arbiters of law are now statutory employees enforcing policy—not the Constitution. This report traces the bait-and-switch that erased judicial power, stripped due process, and left every American at the mercy of a corporate trust system masquerading as justice. A must-read for anyone seeking to understand why real law no longer exists in U.S. courts.
The Ninth Circuit Opening Brief filed by Kevin: Realworldfare unmasks a scheme of judicial fraud and collusion by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and opposing counsel. Sykes ruled on her own disqualification, issued a fraudulent remand order while jurisdictionally dead, and colluded to suppress verified affidavits while elevating unverified hearsay to judgment. The unlawful detainer was void from inception, every order she issued is void ab initio, and fraud vitiates everything—leaving the Ninth Circuit with the duty to vacate all orders and restore rights.
Judges are not immune when they act outside lawful jurisdiction. Under the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, […]
Discover the hidden foundation of the modern financial system: all obligations are securities, and all debts are discharged — not paid — by indorsement and operation of law. This powerful article exposes how HJR-192 of 1933 abolished gold payment, converting every transaction into credit-based discharge under UCC and federal statutes. Learn how Federal Reserve Notes are mere debt instruments, how every obligation is held in trust as a security, and how a properly indorsed instrument lawfully settles any debt. Essential knowledge for asserting your rights, enforcing discharge, and holding fiduciaries accountable for commercial dishonor.
This article explains how the Peace Flag, War Flag, and Gold-Fringed Flag each mark the rules of the forum in which you stand. The Peace Flag signals civil jurisdiction of the People, with constitutional protections intact. The War Flag represents military jurisdiction and emergency powers, where rights are reduced to privileges. The Gold-Fringed Flag designates admiralty or tribunal jurisdiction, applying corporate statutes and procedures under color of law. Flags declare the forum’s operating rules, not who you are as a man or woman.
This document examines the critical shift in American citizenship created by the 14th Amendment. Before 1868, a Citizen (capital C) referred to a state Citizen—sovereign members of the de jure body politic of the several states, recognized as one of the People. The 14th Amendment introduced a new statutory “citizen of the United States,” a federal ens legis fiction tied to corporate jurisdiction rather than inherent sovereignty. By distinguishing between Citizen, state Citizen, “citizen of the United States,” and one of the People, this study clarifies how rights were transformed from unalienable to regulated privileges.
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) codifies due process by requiring notice, opportunity to respond, and a final record before rights or property can be touched. Anchored by the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, the APA reflects both constitutional and statutory safeguards. In commerce and trust law, unrebutted affidavits operate under the same principle: silence equals acquiescence, and the record stands as truth. Attempts to criminalize or intimidate lawful administrative procedure are themselves unlawful, void, and retaliatory.
This article exposes the deliberate conflation of nationality and domicile by corporate governments to ensnare living men and women into foreign jurisdiction. It explains how nationality is a political inheritance by bloodright, establishing sovereignty beyond statutory “citizenship.” It also shows that civil status is not domicile, but standing sui juris on the land, in equity, as master beneficiary of trust property. By asserting both correctly, one collapses fraudulent presumptions and restores the rightful order: the People as sovereign, government as trustee.
The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.
This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.