This document examines the critical shift in American citizenship created by the 14th Amendment. Before 1868, a Citizen (capital C) referred to a state Citizen—sovereign members of the de jure body politic of the several states, recognized as one of the People. The 14th Amendment introduced a new statutory “citizen of the United States,” a federal ens legis fiction tied to corporate jurisdiction rather than inherent sovereignty. By distinguishing between Citizen, state Citizen, “citizen of the United States,” and one of the People, this study clarifies how rights were transformed from unalienable to regulated privileges.
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) codifies due process by requiring notice, opportunity to respond, and a final record before rights or property can be touched. Anchored by the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, the APA reflects both constitutional and statutory safeguards. In commerce and trust law, unrebutted affidavits operate under the same principle: silence equals acquiescence, and the record stands as truth. Attempts to criminalize or intimidate lawful administrative procedure are themselves unlawful, void, and retaliatory.
This article exposes the deliberate conflation of nationality and domicile by corporate governments to ensnare living men and women into foreign jurisdiction. It explains how nationality is a political inheritance by bloodright, establishing sovereignty beyond statutory “citizenship.” It also shows that civil status is not domicile, but standing sui juris on the land, in equity, as master beneficiary of trust property. By asserting both correctly, one collapses fraudulent presumptions and restores the rightful order: the People as sovereign, government as trustee.
The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.
This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.
Every State operates as a corporation—its Constitution is the charter, its House and Senate act as the board of directors, and its statutes function as bylaws. Citizens are treated as franchise participants through licenses, registrations, and contracts, while States issue bonds and securitize debt like any other business. This hidden corporate structure reveals the true commercial character of “government.” Learn more at Realworldfare.com.
The Declaration of Independence is not just patriotic history — it is a signed, binding contract and trust agreement. It establishes government as trustee, the people as beneficiaries, and unalienable rights as the trust corpus to be secured. Unlike later constitutional language about “citizens,” the Declaration protects men and women directly, as living beings endowed by their Creator with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It remains organic law and superior authority, giving the people both the right and the duty to resist and abolish any government that breaches its trust.
The Bill of Rights is the cornerstone of American liberty, protecting freedom of speech, privacy, due process, and more. Ratified in 1791, it was designed to limit government power and safeguard individual rights that exist beyond the reach of authority. This breaks down each amendment in plain language and asks the critical question: is the government still honoring these protections, or slowly eroding them?
A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A historic constitutional and RICO-based legal action is being prepared for filing directly in the U.S. Supreme Court under original jurisdiction. The complaint names federal judges, California officials, and courts as defendants in an alleged conspiracy involving fraud, racketeering, and systemic violations of due process, civil rights, and commercial law. Plaintiff Kevin: Realworldfare asserts the collapse of lawful jurisdiction in both state and federal courts. This case challenges the legitimacy of simulated legal process, judicial treason, and denial of remedy. The Supreme Court is now called upon to intervene at the highest level.
Ask ChatGPT
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.