Ninth Circuit Exposed: Verified Constitutional Challenge Filed by Kevin: Realworldfare as Court Openly Defies the Constitution, Commits Systemic Judicial Obstruction, Violates Rule 17, and Enforces Fraudulent Unconstitutional Policy

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.

Federal Judge Sunshine Sykes Faces Imminent Lawsuit for Treason, Fraud, Misconduct, and Judicial Impersonation as 3 of Her Cases Enter Appeal: A Pattern of Contempt, Recusal Defiance, Treason, and Due Process Destruction

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Trust, Wealth

Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, a federal judge in the Central District of California, is now under intense scrutiny for ruling on her own disqualification in three separate cases, despite verified affidavits of bias, fraud, and constitutional violations. All affected cases are currently on appeal, including a pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and re-removal actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Evidence shows Sykes acted ultra vires, impersonated lawful authority, and obstructed justice under color of law. A federal civil rights and Bivens lawsuit is imminent. This article exposes the full extent of her judicial misconduct and outlines the coming legal consequences.

Ask ChatGPT

Judicial Conflicts of Interest: How Foreclosures Fund the Judge’s Retirement

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article exposes the brutal truth: judges across America are financially incentivized to rule against homeowners because their pensions are funded by mortgage-backed securities and foreclosure profits. Every time a family is evicted, a judge’s retirement account grows—turning the courtroom into a foreclosure mill for Wall Street. This isn’t speculation—it’s documented in CAFRs, SEC filings, and pension fund reports. Judicial impartiality is a lie; the bench is bought, the system is rigged, and due process is dead. If you think you’re getting a fair trial in a property case, you’re already the mark.

Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes Recused by Law on Three (3) Cases — Yet Continues to Obstruct Justice in Multiple Federal Civil Rights Cases

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.

Ask ChatGPT

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed with Ninth Circuit — Treason from the Bench: How Judge Otis D. Wright II Denied Due Process, Obstructed Federal Jurisdiction, and Committed Fraud Upon the Court

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust, Wealth

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Trust, Wealth

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.

Riverside, California FEDERAL Judges Kenly Kato and Sunshine Sykes helping Tamara Wagner continue irreparable harm, engage In Blatant Misconduct, and Defy US Code, MANDATORY DISQUALIFICATION, AND DUE PROCESS

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

In an unthinkable display of judicial defiance, the United States District Court for the Central District of California—specifically Judge Kenly Kiya Kato—has openly violated federal disqualification statutes and constitutional protections, triggering a full-scale procedural breakdown. The Plaintiffs, Kevin Realworldfare and Corey Walker, filed a timely and sufficient affidavit of bias under 28 U.S.C. § 144—invoking a mandatory disqualification. Yet, Judge Kato continues to issue orders and direct proceedings as if the law simply does not apply to her.This is not a mere procedural oversight. This is a calculated refusal to follow the law, a violation of the U.S. Constitution, and an unmistakable act of judicial misconduct.

In Verified Filings Federal Judge Kenly Kiya Kato Accused of Fraud on the Court, Jurisdictional Usurpation, and Deliberate Legal Misrepresentation in Realworldfare Civil Rights Lawsuit

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article exposes verified judicial misconduct by U.S. District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato in the federal civil rights case Kevin Realworldfare et al. v. Tamara Wagner et al. Despite a verified motion for disqualification filed under 28 U.S.C. § 144, Judge Kato continued to rule without jurisdiction—rendering all subsequent actions void ab initio. Plaintiffs allege Kato deliberately misrepresented the law, falsely claiming an affidavit was required despite Ninth Circuit precedent confirming that a verified motion suffices. Meanwhile, state commissioner Tamara Wagner—whose jurisdiction ceased on April 28, 2025, upon federal removal—continued to obstruct access to remedy, deny motions, and execute dispossession orders without lawful authority. Rather than uphold federal supremacy and equity, Kato has doubled down on the fraud, sustaining ultra vires state actions under color of law. Plaintiffs demand her immediate disqualification, vacatur of all rulings, and reassignment to restore judicial integrity.