Steps for Stopping Corrupt Judges and Judicial Fraud: Demand Settlement, and Force the Court to Follow the Law
Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust, Wealth

When courts ignore properly filed affidavits and push cases forward despite clear non-consent, they violate due process and engage in judicial fraud. This guide reveals how to enforce your rights using Notices of Non-Consent, Judicial Fraud, and Estoppel, as well as powerful legal tools like Writs of Mandamus and federal appeals. Learn how to leverage UCC § 3-505 to establish dishonor, invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to compel judicial compliance, and enforce settlement under UCC § 3-603. As the Secured Party and Master Beneficiary, you have the power to demand closure, block fraudulent claims, and hold courts accountable. Take control of your legal standing and force the system to follow the law!

When courts ignore properly filed affidavits and push cases forward despite clear non-consent, they violate due process and engage in judicial fraud. This guide reveals how to enforce your rights using Notices of Non-Consent, Judicial Fraud, and Estoppel, as well as powerful legal tools like Writs of Mandamus and federal appeals. Learn how to leverage UCC § 3-505 to establish dishonor, invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to compel judicial compliance, and enforce settlement under UCC § 3-603. As the Secured Party and Master Beneficiary, you have the power to demand closure, block fraudulent claims, and hold courts accountable. Take control of your legal standing and force the system to follow the law!

Federal Lawsuit Properly Filed, But Clerk’s Office in Riverside, California Seemingly Engaged in Concealment and Tampering
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Tips, Trust

A federal lawsuit has been properly filed in the U.S. District Court, Eastern Division (Riverside, CA), but the clerk’s office is seemingly engaged in concealment, tampering, and obstruction of justice. With all facts legally admitted due to non-rebuttal, judgment is now enforceable. The court must docket the case and comply with federal law immediately.

Wells Fargo’s Obvious Fraud Exposed as Unrebutted Affidavits Demand $1 Billion Summary Judgment
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Wells Fargo faces a Demand for Summary Judgment after failing to rebut sworn affidavits, effectively admitting to fraud, dishonor, and lack of standing. Under California law, summary judgment must be granted as no triable issue of fact exists. The case exposes Wells Fargo’s history of foreclosure fraud, aligning with past rulings where courts dismissed their claims with prejudice. Their silence is a legal admission of guilt, making their claims void ab initio. The court is now required to strike all fraudulent claims and enforce judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

How ‘Consumer Law’ Falls Under the UCC: The Overarching Role of the UCC in Consumer Law and Statutory Remedies
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust, Wealth

Many assume that consumer law exists independently of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and is governed solely by statutes like the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and its implementing regulation, Regulation Z. However, this is a misconception. The UCC plays a critical role in consumer transactions, particularly in areas such as secured transactions, negotiable instruments, sales of goods, and warranties. While consumer protection laws provide remedies and disclosures, the UCC governs the enforceability, structure, and rights associated with consumer agreements.One of the most significant aspects of this relationship is UCC Article 9, which explicitly recognizes “consumers” as “debtors” in secured transactions, reinforcing the UCC’s authority over consumer transactions.

The Loan and Mortgage Illusion: How Your Signature Creates Money/Monetary Instruments and The Hidden Truth About Mortgages, Loans, and Banking: Episode 21
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Tips, Trust, Wealth

In this eye-opening episode of RealWorldFare, we break down the hidden truth about promissory notes, banking, and financial transactions that most people never question. When you sign a promissory note, are you really borrowing money—or funding the entire transaction yourself?

Master Workshop: Mastering Administrative Process, the UCC, & Private Commercial Affairs
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Take Control of Your Commercial Affairs. Everything in commerce is a contract—if you don’t control the terms, you’re bound by them. This course teaches you how to enforce your rights using the UCC & U.S. Code, master administrative processes, and hold entities accountable with notices of default & contract enforcement. Learn to operate privately & lawfully while securing your financial and legal standing.

The UCC Playbook: Unlocking the Power of Contract Law
Categories
Business, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Wealth

In a world where everything operates as a contract, understanding the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) can be the difference between being in control or being controlled. The UCC Playbook: How to Use Contract Law to Secure Your Assets, Family, Freedom, and Enforce Your Rights is a roadmap to reclaiming your financial and legal sovereignty.

Kevin Walker Estate Files Writ of Mandamus, Notice, and Order in Federal Case Demanding Court Enforce $1.1 Billion Contract and Default Judgment, and Sanctions Against Dishonorable Defendants
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate, et al., has escalated its legal battle for rights, accountability, and justice by filing a Writ of Mandamus and an Order Granting Default and Summary Judgment, demanding the court enforce Defendants’ binding default and immediate liability for $1.1 billion. The court has already flagged PHH Mortgage Services’ Motion to Dismiss as defective and subject to striking, further confirming Defendants’ dishonor. With Chevron deference overturned, the court cannot summarily dismiss the case and must rule strictly on constitutional and statutory law. If the court fails to act, Plaintiffs are prepared to pursue appellate relief, federal enforcement, and sanctions for obstruction of justice. This case could set a landmark precedent in holding financial institutions and courts accountable to the rule of law.

How to Lawfully Represent Your ‘Trust’ as an “Attorney-in-Fact” in Accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1654, U.C.C. § 3-402, and Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The right to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is well established in federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and legal precedent. Despite common misconceptions, a trust is a contractual entity that can be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article breaks down the legal foundation supporting this right, key statutory provisions, and how to enforce it against courts and financial institutions that attempt to deny it.

$1.1 Billion Conditional Acceptance Traps Defendants PHH Mortgage in Default as Missing Filings Suddenly Reappear after Writ of Mandamus
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate has strategically filed a Conditional Acceptance in response to PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss, creating a binding contract offer under UCC and contract law. Defendants must now provide verified evidence or face immediate dishonor and default, triggering summary judgment and a $100,000,000 legal award in Plaintiffs’ favor. Adding to the controversy, missing court filings have mysteriously reappeared after Plaintiffs served a Writ of Mandamus, exposing potential judicial misconduct. This case is a critical battle for legal accountability, sovereignty, and due process, forcing courts and corporations to confront their procedural failures. Will the courts uphold the law or expose their corruption?

Kevin Walker Estate Files Historic Affidavit in Federal Court Defending American Sovereignty, private rights, and Constitutional Supremacy
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The right to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is well established in federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and legal precedent. Despite common misconceptions, a trust is a contractual entity that can be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article breaks down the legal foundation supporting this right, key statutory provisions, and how to enforce it against courts and financial institutions that attempt to deny it.

The Kevin Walker Estate has filed a historic legal challenge asserting American sovereignty, constitutional supremacy, and jurisdictional limits. This Verified Affidavit confronts government overreach, legal presumptions, and federal misapplications of law—placing the courts on notice. This case could set a powerful precedent for self-governance, private property rights, and true legal accountability. Will the courts uphold the Constitution, or expose the depth of their corruption?

Riverside, California U.S. District Court Blatantly Complicit in Various Federal Violations: Plaintiffs Demand Justice Against Conspiracy and Defendants’ Illegal and Unlawful Acts
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The case of Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. Jay Promisco, PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. reveals systemic corruption, legal incompetence, and judicial misconduct. PHH Mortgage, led by attorney Neil J. Cooper, has engaged in fraud, obstruction, and misrepresentation, while the Riverside Federal Court has actively suppressed key filings. Plaintiffs have filed a Verified Demand for criminal enforcement, sanctions, and summary judgment, exposing PHH’s baseless legal tactics. The overturning of the Chevron Doctrine further invalidates PHH’s arguments, proving bad faith litigation. This case is a critical fight against judicial corruption, demanding accountability, due process, and legal sanctions.