The Guardians of Equity How Article III Courts Protect Unrebutted Affidavit, Rights, and Uphold Contracts
The Guardians of Equity: How Article III Courts Protect Unrebutted Affidavit, Rights, and Uphold Contracts
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

An Article III court provides essential protections in civil contract disputes involving unrebutted affidavits. It ensures due process, enforces uncontested evidence, and offers both legal and equitable remedies. With exclusive equity jurisdiction, these courts can compel performance, issue injunctions, and affirm binding agreements, safeguarding constitutional rights and justice.

Read more
Foundational Case Law on Standing, Mortgage Fraud, Foreclosure, Corporate Overreach
Foundational “Case Law” on Standing, Mortgage Fraud, Foreclosure, Corporate Overreach
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Uncategorized, Wealth

This case law summary highlights key legal principles on jurisdiction, standing, and procedural requirements in financial and mortgage-related cases. Courts consistently void judgments rendered without proper jurisdiction and emphasize the need for plaintiffs to demonstrate legal standing. Fraudulent lending practices, including violations of federal regulations, have led to dismissals with prejudice. Corporate overreach by banks is curtailed through rulings that prohibit lending credit and ultra vires contracts. Evidentiary standards stress the sufficiency of affidavits and the duty to disclose information to prevent fraud. Contract principles underscore the nullification of agreements based on illegal consideration

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 02 05 at 3.46.23 PM
BMW OF FLORENCE AND BMW OF NORTH AMERICA FACING $100M Lawsuit: UNREBUTTED Affidavits Confirming CONSPIRACY, RICO, EMBEZZLEMENT, AND THEFT FROM THE BRIAN VICTOR CHARLES ESTATE
Categories
Business, Cardano, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

BMW of Florence and BMW of North America face serious assertions from the Brian Victor Charles Estate, including conspiracy, racketeering, and theft. Central to the case are unrebutted affidavits and the alleged unlawful repossession of a vehicle from BMW Florence’s private property.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 02 05 at 7.56.07 AM
GEORGIAS OWN v. KEVIN WALKER ESTATE: Purported Defendants Secure Victory and Demand $1M in Costs and Damages
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Defendants Kevin Walker and Donnabelle Mortel, both nationals, secure a victory as a fraudulent unlawful detainer case is dismissed. They now demand and are entitled to at least $1,000,000 in legal costs, compensatory and punitive damages, and sanctions for procedural misconduct and fraud on the court. The case sets a precedent for holding plaintiffs accountable for abuse of the judicial process

Read more
How 'Bills of Exchange' are Currency 31 USC 5118, 12 USC 412, UCC 3 601, 3 603, 3 311, HJR 192 (public law 73 10) and more
How ‘Bills of Exchange’ are Currency: 31 USC 5118, 12 USC 412, UCC 3-601, 3-603, 3-311, HJR 192 (public law 73-10) and more
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

according to statutes, codes, and public policy, bills of exchange are legally recognized as currency because they discharge debt obligations in commerce. HJR 192, 31 USC 5118, and 12 USC 412 establish that debt instruments replace gold as legal payment. UCC provisions (3-603, 3-311, and 3-601) confirm that offering a bill of exchange settles debts, even if refused.

Read more
Pro Se vs. Pro Per A Guide to Jurisdictional Differences and Legal Representation
“Pro Se” vs. “Pro Per”: A Guide to Jurisdictional Differences and Legal Representation
Categories
Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

Learn about the differences between “Pro Se” and “Pro Per” representation in legal matters, particularly when it comes to trust representation. “Pro Se” refers to representing oneself voluntarily within the court’s jurisdiction, while “Pro Per” allows individuals to assert their personal status and challenge court jurisdiction. This distinction highlights the power of an Affidavit of Power of Attorney In Fact, which grants an Attorney In Fact the authority to represent a trust, bypassing the need for a licensed attorney in public jurisdiction. Understand how these legal roles impact court standing and the ability to assert constitutional and contractual rights

Read more
The Redefinition of U.S. Currency The Impact of the Emergency Banking Act, HJR 192, Title 31 U.S. Code, and Constructive Expansion Policy
The Redefinition of U.S. Currency: The Impact of the Emergency Banking Act, HJR 192, Title 31 U.S. Code, and Constructive Expansion Policy
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The U.S. financial system underwent a monumental transformation due to the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR 192), and key provisions of Title 31 U.S. Code, including 31 U.S.C. § 3123, § 5118, and § 5103. These legislative acts, combined with the Constructive Expansion Policy established by Congress on March 9, 1933, fundamentally reshaped the nature of currency and debt obligations in the United States. This shift not only dismantled the gold standard but also recognized negotiable instruments—including bills of exchange, bonds, and acceptances—as legal currency.

Read more
citizen of the United States A 'ens legis' Born from the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment
“citizen of the United States”: A ‘ens legis’ Born from the Fourteenth (14th) Amendment
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The concept of citizenship in the United States is more complex than commonly understood. Legal precedents and statutory definitions reveal a critical distinction between a “state Citizen” (also referred to as a “national”) and a “citizen of the United States.” This article explores this distinction, highlighting key legal authorities, statutory provisions, and judicial opinions to clarify the implications for individuals seeking to understand their legal status and rights

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 01 30 at 8.29.18 AM
Stolen Heritage: The Journey from Sovereign “American Indian” to Misclassified as “African American”
Categories
Constitution, Education, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns

The journey from “American Indian” to “African American” is a deliberate and systematic reclassification rooted in colonial erasure, legal deception, and social manipulation. At the core of this identity theft is the truth that many of the so-called “Black” or “African American” people today are actually the copper-toned indigenous people native to the Americas—true American Indians. These are not descendants of slaves brought solely from Africa but rather the original inhabitants of this land, whose lineage predates Columbus and European colonization.

Through calculated reclassification, these Native Americans were stripped of their birthright, their land, and their identity. The tragedy of this historical theft continues today, as many have unknowingly abandoned their American nationality and ancestral roots to associate themselves with a foreign continent—Africa—an identity that was never theirs to begin with.

Read more
Republic vs. Democracy Swearing into Office an Allegiance to the 'Republic' or a Fiction?
Republic vs. Democracy: Swearing into Office an Allegiance to the ‘Republic’ or a Fiction?
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education

This article explores the distinction between a constitutional republic and a corporate fiction-based government, focusing on how taking an oath to a corporate entity rather than the Constitution may shift an official’s allegiance from safeguarding individual rights to upholding statutory law. It delves into the legal implications of swearing an additional oath after already pledging to uphold the Constitution, suggesting this move could turn officials into functionaries of a corporate state rather than true constitutional representatives.

Read more
Screen Shot 2025 01 29 at 9.03.04 AM
Trillion Dollar ‘Right to Travel’ Lawsuit: Riverside County Sheriff in Default and All Allegations now Admitted and Confirmed Facts including Racketeering, Conspiracy, Kidnapping, Coercion, Extortion, and more
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Riverside Sheriff’s Department is facing a $1 trillion lawsuit, while the California Highway Patrol (CHP) is facing a separate $900 billion lawsuit. Both lawsuits stem from the failure of these agencies to respond to formal legal notices from Kevin Walker, resulting in the admission of guilt for allegations of fraud, racketeering, identity theft, extortion, and conspiracy. These coordinated actions by the Sheriff’s Department and CHP reflect a broader effort to weaponize legal and enforcement systems against citizens, and the lawsuits are seeking both criminal prosecution and civil restitution.

Read more
The Sovereign Dilemma Benefits vs. Rights and the Ashwander Doctrine and Constitutional Estoppel
The Sovereign Dilemma: Benefits vs. Rights and the Ashwander Doctrine and Constitutional Estoppel
Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In the American legal system, a fundamental distinction exists between benefits and rights—and understanding this distinction is critical if you aim to assert sovereign status or challenge government authority. At the heart of this issue lies the principle of constitutional estoppel, reinforced by the Ashwander Rules and long-standing doctrines in equity. Simply put: When you accept a government benefit, you forfeit certain rights, including the right to challenge the law that governs that benefit.

Read more