Description
Judicial Immunity Myth: Exposed™ is a comprehensive legal strategy guide that dismantles the false presumption of judicial immunity when judges act outside their lawful jurisdiction. This resource arms legal professionals, litigants, and rights-defenders with the black-letter law, constitutional anchors, and controlling case law proving that judicial actors are personally liable when they operate ultra vires — outside Article III authority — and enter the realm of commerce.
This guide draws from the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943)), which establishes that when government officers — including judges — operate commercially (issuing bonds, orders, or judgments without lawful jurisdiction), they function as private actors, stripped of sovereign authority and exposed to personal civil and criminal liability.
What’s Inside:
-
Constitutional Foundations: Article III, Fifth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, and Supremacy Clause constraints on judicial power.
-
Civil Liability Pathways: 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Bivens, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, and Ex parte Young remedies.
-
Criminal Exposure Framework: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 as markers of criminal conduct under color of law.
-
11 Critical Triggers of Ultra Vires Acts: including ruling on their own recusal, ignoring mandatory disqualification, proceeding without corpus delicti, fabricating law, and ignoring verified affidavits.
-
Commerce & Dishonor: How courts monetize judgments and how dishonor in process creates commercial liability.
-
Strategic Enforcement Tactics: Turning verified affidavits, default, and administrative dishonor into actionable leverage.
Outcome:
By the end, you’ll understand exactly when judges cross the line from judicial officers to private actors, and how to hold them personally liable in law, equity, and commerce — with precision, documentation, and jurisdictional control.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.