This article establishes that verified filings under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 constitute sworn evidence equal to notarized affidavits and, when unrebutted, stand as final truth in law. Supported by Rule 8(b)(6) and Rule 56, it demonstrates that verified facts must be admitted and summary judgment becomes mandatory once no genuine dispute remains. Federal precedent confirms that attorney argument is not evidence (Trinsey v. Pagliaro, 229 F. Supp. 647) and that verified complaints carry full evidentiary weight. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, all statutory and public acts are commercial, binding officials to the same evidentiary standards as private parties. Any judicial act ignoring verified truth is ultra vires, void ab initio, and actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents.
California’s federal courts and the Ninth Circuit are running a theater of fraud — ignoring jurisdiction, striking verified filings, and sustaining slavery to debts already discharged. Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, disqualified by law, continued to rule without authority, while the Ninth Circuit now appears complicit in preserving fraud and peonage under color of law. Every affidavit, deed, and UCC filing remains unrebutted and admitted, yet due process and the Bill of Rights are trampled. Fraud vitiates everything — and the entire record proves these proceedings are void ab initio. — The Supreme Court is next and a lawsuit againt the State of California, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta, Sunshine Sykes, Tamara Wagner, and every actor/trustee/fiduciary/fraudster involved in one BIG rico lawsuit demanding criminal prosecution.
Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.