Discover the shocking truth behind America’s hidden transformation. Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 exposes how the Judicial Improvements Act quietly dismantled constitutional courts and replaced them with corporate administrative tribunals. Judges who were once independent arbiters of law are now statutory employees enforcing policy—not the Constitution. This report traces the bait-and-switch that erased judicial power, stripped due process, and left every American at the mercy of a corporate trust system masquerading as justice. A must-read for anyone seeking to understand why real law no longer exists in U.S. courts.
In a monumental legal development, the Kevin Walker Estate v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company case has been removed to federal court and initially assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. However, the Kevin Walker Estate has declined to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate and formally filed a "Plaintiffs’ Notice of Decline of Consent to Be Heard by a Magistrate Judge and Demand for an Article III Judge." This demand underscores the Plaintiffs’ assertion of their constitutional right to adjudication by a lifetime-appointed federal judge under Article III of the U.S. Constitution
An Article III court provides essential protections in civil contract disputes involving unrebutted affidavits. It ensures due process, enforces uncontested evidence, and offers both legal and equitable remedies. With exclusive equity jurisdiction, these courts can compel performance, issue injunctions, and affirm binding agreements, safeguarding constitutional rights and justice.
The U.S. judicial system operates under a dual structure of federal and state courts, each with defined jurisdiction based on the U.S. Constitution and statutory law. This structure was codified under the Judicial Code of June 25, 1948 (62 Stat. 869). Below is an overview of the courts, their constitutional basis, and how different methods of pleading—pro se and sui juris, in propria persona—affect one’s standing.