The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.
A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.
Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.
Ask ChatGPT
This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.
A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.
Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT
This article exposes the deliberate design behind California’s judicial corruption, focusing on how courts enable foreclosure fraud and obstruct lawful remedy to protect financial interests. It outlines the deep ties between judges, public pensions, and mortgage-backed securities, explaining how systemic bias against pro se litigants and equity claims maintains a rigged foreclosure racket. From fraudulent trustees’ deeds to administrative sabotage, California courts serve revenue and institutional protection—not justice. The piece makes clear that equity, truth, and due process are casualties of a machine built to seize assets, not resolve claims.
This article exposes verified judicial misconduct by U.S. District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato in the federal civil rights case Kevin Realworldfare et al. v. Tamara Wagner et al. Despite a verified motion for disqualification filed under 28 U.S.C. § 144, Judge Kato continued to rule without jurisdiction—rendering all subsequent actions void ab initio. Plaintiffs allege Kato deliberately misrepresented the law, falsely claiming an affidavit was required despite Ninth Circuit precedent confirming that a verified motion suffices. Meanwhile, state commissioner Tamara Wagner—whose jurisdiction ceased on April 28, 2025, upon federal removal—continued to obstruct access to remedy, deny motions, and execute dispossession orders without lawful authority. Rather than uphold federal supremacy and equity, Kato has doubled down on the fraud, sustaining ultra vires state actions under color of law. Plaintiffs demand her immediate disqualification, vacatur of all rulings, and reassignment to restore judicial integrity.
Plaintiff Kevin: Realworldfare has filed a verified federal lawsuit exposing a coordinated racketeering scheme involving attorneys Barry Lee O’Connor and John Bailey, along with foreign operative Naji Doumit, to unlawfully seize private trust property through fraud and simulated legal process. The complaint, backed by unrebutted affidavits and perfected UCC filings, demands immediate injunctive relief, cancellation of a void deed, and civil RICO damages. Judges involved in obstructing the filings may be added as defendants for complicity and jurisdictional misconduct. All claims stand unrebutted, triggering legal default and commercial dishonor. The case challenges systemic corruption in courts and attacks on private property rights.
A federal RICO lawsuit filed in the Central District of California exposes a coordinated conspiracy involving attorneys Barry Lee O’Connor and John Bailey, MARINAJ PROPERTIES, and the Doumit family. The Verified Complaint details simulated legal process, fraudulent conveyance, and theft of trust property through a void Trustee’s Deed. Despite unrebutted affidavits and perfected title filings, Judge Rachel A. Marquez has enabled the fraud by refusing to sanction the guilty and instead targeting Americans asserting their rights. The case alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962, 241, 1341, and California Civil Code §§ 1709, 3346. This is judicial conspiracy at its peak—where bar members are protected, and real parties in interest are punished. The outcome will test whether equity and law still matter in California’s courts.