The Central District of California is no longer functioning as a lawful Article III tribunal. It is operating as a coordinated mechanism of obstruction—systematically ignoring Rule 8, refusing mandatory Rule 55 defaults, and suppressing Rule 56 evidence in open defiance of due process. This pattern is not accidental but structural, presenting all hallmarks of a federal judiciary acting as a criminal enterprise under color of law. The result is a full constitutional collapse in which rights cannot be enforced, remedies cannot be obtained, and justice has been replaced with procedural illusion. Immediate Supreme Court intervention is not optional—it is constitutionally required.
Non-judicial foreclosure is an unconstitutional taking that violates due process and property rights by letting private actors seize homes without proving a debt is owed. Banks are often paid twice — or more — through insurance and investor payouts before they foreclose, yet still commit property theft with no courtroom oversight. At the same time, the note and deed are frequently split, destroying any lawful right to enforce foreclosure but ignored in practice. This article exposes how millions lose their homes through a non-judicial system engineered to bypass Constitutional protections and strip homeowners of their rights.
The Private Litigators Group™ is a private, invitation-only alliance for living men and women who refuse to be silenced or railroaded by corrupt courts, predatory BAR attorneys, and color-of-law abuses. We empower members with bulletproof sui juris strategies, verified complaints, federal jurisdiction mastery, and the administrative tools needed to stand above the system—not beneath it. This is not public lawyering; it is private knowledge, private contract, and private power. Reclaim your standing, enforce your rights, and end the courts’ reliance on your ignorance. Membership is limited and strictly private.
California’s federal courts and the Ninth Circuit are running a theater of fraud — ignoring jurisdiction, striking verified filings, and sustaining slavery to debts already discharged. Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, disqualified by law, continued to rule without authority, while the Ninth Circuit now appears complicit in preserving fraud and peonage under color of law. Every affidavit, deed, and UCC filing remains unrebutted and admitted, yet due process and the Bill of Rights are trampled. Fraud vitiates everything — and the entire record proves these proceedings are void ab initio. — The Supreme Court is next and a lawsuit againt the State of California, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta, Sunshine Sykes, Tamara Wagner, and every actor/trustee/fiduciary/fraudster involved in one BIG rico lawsuit demanding criminal prosecution.
The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.
A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.
Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.
Ask ChatGPT
This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.
A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.
Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT