A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.
This article exposes the legal power of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 removals and the non-discretionary appellate review authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). When a case is removed to federal court on civil rights grounds, federal jurisdiction attaches immediately—and any remand issued without adjudicating those rights is void. The article outlines how fraudulent remand orders, especially when combined with fabricated party substitutions, violate due process and trigger mandatory reversal. This is a must-read for anyone asserting federal protections in hostile state forums.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, a federal judge in the Central District of California, is now under intense scrutiny for ruling on her own disqualification in three separate cases, despite verified affidavits of bias, fraud, and constitutional violations. All affected cases are currently on appeal, including a pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and re-removal actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Evidence shows Sykes acted ultra vires, impersonated lawful authority, and obstructed justice under color of law. A federal civil rights and Bivens lawsuit is imminent. This article exposes the full extent of her judicial misconduct and outlines the coming legal consequences.
Ask ChatGPT
This article exposes the brutal truth: judges across America are financially incentivized to rule against homeowners because their pensions are funded by mortgage-backed securities and foreclosure profits. Every time a family is evicted, a judge’s retirement account grows—turning the courtroom into a foreclosure mill for Wall Street. This isn’t speculation—it’s documented in CAFRs, SEC filings, and pension fund reports. Judicial impartiality is a lie; the bench is bought, the system is rigged, and due process is dead. If you think you’re getting a fair trial in a property case, you’re already the mark.
Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.
Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.
Ask ChatGPT
A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.
Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT
This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.
In an unthinkable display of judicial defiance, the United States District Court for the Central District of California—specifically Judge Kenly Kiya Kato—has openly violated federal disqualification statutes and constitutional protections, triggering a full-scale procedural breakdown. The Plaintiffs, Kevin Realworldfare and Corey Walker, filed a timely and sufficient affidavit of bias under 28 U.S.C. § 144—invoking a mandatory disqualification. Yet, Judge Kato continues to issue orders and direct proceedings as if the law simply does not apply to her.This is not a mere procedural oversight. This is a calculated refusal to follow the law, a violation of the U.S. Constitution, and an unmistakable act of judicial misconduct.
Plaintiff Kevin: Realworldfare has filed a verified federal lawsuit exposing a coordinated racketeering scheme involving attorneys Barry Lee O’Connor and John Bailey, along with foreign operative Naji Doumit, to unlawfully seize private trust property through fraud and simulated legal process. The complaint, backed by unrebutted affidavits and perfected UCC filings, demands immediate injunctive relief, cancellation of a void deed, and civil RICO damages. Judges involved in obstructing the filings may be added as defendants for complicity and jurisdictional misconduct. All claims stand unrebutted, triggering legal default and commercial dishonor. The case challenges systemic corruption in courts and attacks on private property rights.