This article exposes how every loan, mortgage, and public utility billing contract operates as a federally recognized government obligation — not a private contract. Backed by statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 8, 12 U.S.C. § 411, and 31 U.S.C. § 3123, the credit you generate is monetized and guaranteed by the United States Treasury. Banks and utility companies merely act as intermediaries, while your signature creates the actual value. This legal breakdown reveals the true debtor-creditor dynamic hidden behind everyday commerce. The truth isn’t theory — it’s codified in law.
This exposé uncovers how the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) secretly holds legal title to your birth bond, court judgments, and financial instruments — without consent, disclosure, or remedy. Through nominee shell CEDE & Co., and in coordination with the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve, your estate is monetized and cleared as a security. Backed by statutes, case law, and the Uniform Commercial Code, this article reveals how to collapse the presumption and reclaim your lawful status as the secured party creditor. This is not theory — this is codified commercial enslavement by silence and inaction. Read it. Reclaim it.
This article establishes that verified filings under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 constitute sworn evidence equal to notarized affidavits and, when unrebutted, stand as final truth in law. Supported by Rule 8(b)(6) and Rule 56, it demonstrates that verified facts must be admitted and summary judgment becomes mandatory once no genuine dispute remains. Federal precedent confirms that attorney argument is not evidence (Trinsey v. Pagliaro, 229 F. Supp. 647) and that verified complaints carry full evidentiary weight. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, all statutory and public acts are commercial, binding officials to the same evidentiary standards as private parties. Any judicial act ignoring verified truth is ultra vires, void ab initio, and actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents.
Every court case in the United States is monetized through bid, performance, and payment bonds, converted into securities under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042 and invested through CRIS with CUSIP identifiers. By law, 12 U.S.C. § 411 confirms Federal Reserve notes are obligations of the United States, while 18 U.S.C. § 8 defines bonds, notes, and securities as “obligations or other securities of the United States.” Asserting status as real party in interest and secured party creditor is essential, because under UCC § 9-315(a)(1), a perfected security interest continues in collateral despite any transfer or disposition. Judges and clerks, acting as corporate sureties under 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, conceal financial conflicts requiring disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455. Since 1933, all obligations have been discharged in credit, making courtrooms bonded, securitized, and monetized enterprises — unless the secured party reclaims the funds.
California’s federal courts and the Ninth Circuit are running a theater of fraud — ignoring jurisdiction, striking verified filings, and sustaining slavery to debts already discharged. Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, disqualified by law, continued to rule without authority, while the Ninth Circuit now appears complicit in preserving fraud and peonage under color of law. Every affidavit, deed, and UCC filing remains unrebutted and admitted, yet due process and the Bill of Rights are trampled. Fraud vitiates everything — and the entire record proves these proceedings are void ab initio. — The Supreme Court is next and a lawsuit againt the State of California, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta, Sunshine Sykes, Tamara Wagner, and every actor/trustee/fiduciary/fraudster involved in one BIG rico lawsuit demanding criminal prosecution.
Discover the unstoppable power of unrebutted affidavits — the most overlooked yet decisive weapon in law. This guide proves that under FRCP, CFR, and binding precedent, unrebutted affidavits stand as admitted truth and demand judgment by law. When judges ignore them, they abandon jurisdiction, immunity, and lawful authority — exposing themselves as private actors under the Clearfield Doctrine. Master the rules, maxims, and case law that transform silence into default and default into judgment. Perfect for anyone seeking to enforce rights with precision, finality, and commercial leverage.
The Ninth Circuit Opening Brief filed by Kevin: Realworldfare unmasks a scheme of judicial fraud and collusion by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and opposing counsel. Sykes ruled on her own disqualification, issued a fraudulent remand order while jurisdictionally dead, and colluded to suppress verified affidavits while elevating unverified hearsay to judgment. The unlawful detainer was void from inception, every order she issued is void ab initio, and fraud vitiates everything—leaving the Ninth Circuit with the duty to vacate all orders and restore rights.
Judges are not immune when they act outside lawful jurisdiction. Under the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, […]
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.
A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.
This article exposes the legal power of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 removals and the non-discretionary appellate review authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). When a case is removed to federal court on civil rights grounds, federal jurisdiction attaches immediately—and any remand issued without adjudicating those rights is void. The article outlines how fraudulent remand orders, especially when combined with fabricated party substitutions, violate due process and trigger mandatory reversal. This is a must-read for anyone asserting federal protections in hostile state forums.