Judges Can Be Sued: Public Servants, Oaths, and Liability Under the Clearfield Doctrine

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips

Judges are not immune when they operate outside lawful jurisdiction, conspire under color of law, or engage in commercial enforcement without consent. Under the Clearfield Doctrine, they become corporate actors subject to liability like any private party. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 enables civil rights lawsuits against them individually, while 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 provides for criminal penalties for conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Through tort law, UCC, and case law like Rankin v. Howard, 633 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1980), and Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984), judges can face personal and injunctive accountability.

How Peace Officers Operate in Ignorance under ‘color of law’ when they violate their Oath and the Constitution – Episode 32

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust, Wealth

Many officers act under "color of law" without realizing it—enforcing statutes that violate rights due to poor training or unchecked presumptions. This episode explores how police, sheriffs, and highway patrol officers can unknowingly cross legal boundaries and how the Constitution remains supreme over policy. Once properly noticed, officers are bound by their oath and must cease unlawful enforcement.

Federal Law Prohibits Judges, Marshals, and Clerks from Practicing Law: A Safeguard Against Conflicts of Interest

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

Federal statutes strictly prohibit judges, U.S. marshals, and court clerks from engaging in the practice of law or any outside employment that interferes with their official duties. These restrictions are designed to ensure judicial impartiality, prevent conflicts of interest, and uphold public trust in the legal system.