The Power of Unrebutted Affidavits and the Role of Summary Judgment in Legal Proceedings

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In legal proceedings, the importance of an unrebutted affidavit cannot be overstated. When an affidavit is not contested, it holds the power to determine the outcome of a case, often leading to summary judgment. Summary judgment, a legal procedure used to resolve cases without a trial, is granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact. An unrebutted affidavit is a crucial tool in supporting this process, as it provides irrefutable evidence that, if unchallenged, becomes the foundation of the court’s ruling.

In both federal and state legal systems, summary judgment is a mechanism designed to expedite legal proceedings by resolving disputes when no material facts are in dispute. The power of an unrebutted affidavit is intertwined with summary judgment, as it can shift the balance of a case and establish the facts that form the basis for judgment.

California Highway Patrol’s Presumed Dishonor (UCC 3-505) as $900 Billion Federal Travel Lawsuit Appears Inevitable

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Kevin: Walker, a natural, freeborn Sovereign, national, and state Citizen of the California De’Jure Republic, brings forth undeniable evidence of default, fraud, and violations of constitutional rights under color of law. Despite clear and lawful communication through affidavits and notices, the named respondents failed to provide a valid, point-for-point response, thereby admitting to the claims by tacit procuration. These violations include identity theft, extortion, racketeering, and deprivation of rights, causing significant harm to the Affiant. Standing on constitutional and natural law principles, Kevin asserts his inherent rights, citing U.S. Supreme Court precedents and legal maxims. The evidence establishes a prima facie case, rendering the respondents liable for damages, with no immunity shielding their unlawful actions. This case underscores the importance of accountability, due process, and the protection of individual rights

Plaintiffs in Billion Dollar ‘RICO’ and Fraud Lawsuit Against SDCCU and Sheppard Mullin File Conditional Acceptance to Arbitration Motion, and Demand Criminal Prosecution and Judgment

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

A high-stakes legal battle in the Southern District of Florida has escalated as plaintiffs have filed a Plaintiffs’ Conditional Acceptance to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, along with a Plaintiffs’ Demand for Criminal Referral and Prosecution of Defendants, sanctions, and a motion for Default and Summary Judgment. The filing underscores serious allegations of misconduct and constitutional violations by the defendants, questioning the legitimacy of the court’s authority and procedural fairness in the case.

Executive Order by Trump – ‘PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP’

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

"Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship" is an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on January 20, 2025. This order seeks to reinterpret the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, aiming to end birthright citizenship for certain individuals born in the United States.

KEVIN WALKER ESTATE Files Racketeering, Fraud, and Conspiracy Claim Against Menifee Justice Center, Affirming Violation of HJR 192 Public Law 73-10

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In a groundbreaking legal case, the Kevin Walker Estate has filed a $100 million claim against the Menifee Justice Center, accusing it of racketeering, conspiracy, extortion, and coercion. The claim centers on affirmed violations of House Joint Resolution 192 of 1933 (Public Law 73-10), which prohibits requiring payment in specific forms of currency, including Federal Reserve Notes. This claim is supported by an unrebutted affidavit, which, under commercial law, is legally considered truth. The case highlights constitutional concerns, including Article I, Section 10, which forbids states from impairing contractual obligations. Using principles from the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Kevin Walker Estate asserts that the Justice Center’s failure to rebut the claims creates a self-executing contract, solidifying liability. Legal experts suggest the case could set a precedent for challenging governmental overreach in financial and legal matters. The U.S. Attorney General and the Menifee Justice Center have yet to respond, but the case could significantly influence the enforcement of HJR 192 Public Law 73-10 and individual rights protections.

Georgia’s Own Requests Dismissal of Their Fraudulent Lawsuit, While $30 Billion Judgement and Obligation Remains Enforceable and Due to KEVIN WALKER ESTATE

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Georgia’s Own Credit Union dismissed its lawsuit (Case No. UDME2400947) after the KEVIN WALKER ESTATE exposed fraud and secured a $30 billion judgment. Using UCC §§ 1-103, 2-204, and 2-206, KEVIN WALKER ESTATE proved procedural dishonor, fraud, and bad faith. The judgment, enforceable as a matter of law, highlights the power of unrebutted evidence and legal maxims in commercial disputes. This case is a landmark victory for justice and accountability.

‘Private Rights of Action’ Demystified: Avoiding Mistakes That Get Your Lawsuit Dismissed

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In the U.S. legal system, there is a fundamental distinction between criminal statutes and private rights of action. Criminal statutes define offenses against the state or public and are generally enforced by governmental prosecutors, such as the Attorney General, District Attorneys, or similar authorities. On the other hand, private rights of action enable individuals to bring lawsuits in civil court to enforce their rights or seek remedies for harm.

This article explores the relationship between these two areas of law, focusing on the limitations of criminal statutes for private litigants and the necessity of an explicitly articulated private right of action for civil claims.

Judge Roy K Altman Shows Bias and ERRONEOUSLY calls Uniform Commercial Code, 12 USC 411 and 412, and House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5 1933 (public law 73-10) Frivolous”

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

In a recent and controversial ruling, Judge Roy K. Altman remanded a case back to state court, but his treatment of the law, particularly with regard to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and key federal statutes, is both troubling and legally indefensible. The plaintiffs cited well-established legal principles to support their claims, yet Judge Altman dismissed them without adequate explanation, as though these laws simply don’t exist. Most disturbingly, his ruling extends to dismissing the very foundational principles of U.S. financial law, including the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve Note and its origins in House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 (Public Law 73-10)—a claim that is, frankly, nonsense.

CFPB Sues Experian for Sham Investigations of Credit Report Errors

Categories
Business, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trading, Trust

Riverside County, California – Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued Experian, the nationwide consumer reporting agency, for unlawfully […]

$900 Billion ‘Right to Travel’ lawsuit: KEVIN WALKER ESTATE Issues California Highway Patrol a NOTICE OF DEFAULT and Opportunity to Cure

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In a landmark assertion of constitutional and contractual rights, Kevin, a state Citizen: Californian, national, proceeding sui juris (in one’s own right), has issued a Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure to Defendants James J Gaffney, Kevin Joseph Smale, Chad Bianco, Grewel, KEVIN SMALE, JAMES GAFFNEY, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF. Kevin’s claims are now confirmed as admitted and true, supported by an unrebutted commercial affidavit that has rendered all facts stated as established under the law. The dispute revolves around Kevin’s claim of his unalienable right to travel freely without being subjected to commercial regulations designed for corporate entities or individuals engaged in commerce, and the deprivation of his rights under the color of law. 

Imminent Billion Dollar Lawsuit Against RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT for Racketeering, Identity Theft, Fraud, and Extortion

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

In what promises to be a high-stakes and precedent-setting legal battle, ™KEVIN WALKER© ESTATE, and related entities have issued a notice of intent to pursue confirmed claims against multiple defendants, including Rancho California Water District, its officers, trustees, and Does 1-100 inclusive. The claimants affirm an array of serious violations, including fraud, racketeering, conspiracym identity theft, extortion, conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under the color of law. With an intricate framework of legal statutes and principles underpinning the admitted violations and felony crimes (thus the unrebutted affidavits), the lawsuit could set a powerful example of using legal mechanisms to demand accountability.

The “Matrix” of Truth: Explaining the Basis of Every Lawsuit (the Matrix)

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

The term matrix, as defined across editions of Black’s Law Dictionary, is crucial in understanding legal processes, particularly in lawsuits. The matrix refers to the original draft or protocol of a legal instrument from which all copies and actions must originate. This foundational concept directly connects to lawsuits, which are inherently commercial in nature. Further, Title 27 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 72.11 explicitly classifies all crimes as commercial crimes, reinforcing the commercial framework underlying lawsuits. When combined, these concepts demonstrate how lawsuits involve a matrix that ties together all charges, claims, and related matters within a commercial context.