This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, a federal judge in the Central District of California, is now under intense scrutiny for ruling on her own disqualification in three separate cases, despite verified affidavits of bias, fraud, and constitutional violations. All affected cases are currently on appeal, including a pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and re-removal actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Evidence shows Sykes acted ultra vires, impersonated lawful authority, and obstructed justice under color of law. A federal civil rights and Bivens lawsuit is imminent. This article exposes the full extent of her judicial misconduct and outlines the coming legal consequences.
Ask ChatGPT
Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.
Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.
Ask ChatGPT
This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.
A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.
Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT
A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.
Kevin and Donnabella Realworldfare have lawfully changed their names, creating a new family dynasty with a name never before used in recorded history. Their children, Adonis and Zoiya Realworldfare, become the first heirs to carry forward this sovereign legacy. The Realworldfare name represents authorship, truth, and freedom from inherited fiction. This name change marks the foundation of a private, self-governed bloodline rooted in purpose and lawful inheritance.
This minimalist legal graphic showcases Canon 2055 and Canon 2056, foundational principles in equity and trust law. Canon 2055 affirms that a legal fiction cannot own property, while Canon 2056 declares that unrebutted claims in the public record stand as law. The clean, centered design emphasizes the gravity and simplicity of these doctrines. Though not codified in statutory law, these canons govern how presumptions, trusts, and legal identity function within commercial and administrative systems. This image is ideal for educational or advocacy use in private law and sovereignty discussions.
Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani have engaged in a criminal racketeering enterprise in Riverside County, California, committing fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under color of law. Rogers and Raxter, both inactive and unauthorized to practice law, unlawfully acted as judicial officers, issuing void orders and illegal warrants. Vermani knowingly pursued fraudulent prosecutions despite clear constitutional violations, further implicating her under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and RICO 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Their coordinated acts constitute felonies and establish a pattern of racketeering activity subject to immediate federal civil rights and criminal actions. All fraudulent obligations have been assigned to the Treasury under UCC 1-308 and 31 U.S.C. § 3123, and full prosecution and sanctions are being pursued.
Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County, District Attorney Michael Hestrin, Deputies Derrick Eastwood, Nicholas Gruwell, Robert Bowman, and associates stand in verified default for $1,000,000,000 under active federal case No. 5:25-cv-00646-WLH-MAA. Unrebutted affidavits and commercial notices confirm violations of RICO, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242. Despite standing in commercial dishonor and default, Bianco is actively campaigning for Governor of California. High-level officials Pam Bondi and Kash Patel were formally notified but failed to act, compounding their exposure to Misprision of Felony. The People of California now face irrefutable evidence of systemic criminal racketeering under the false color of law by Riverside County officials.