When a Home Auction Sale is Void Ab Initio: The Truth About Unauthorized Trustee Sales in Non-Judicial Foreclosures

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

In this episode, uncover how loan servicers weaponize non-judicial foreclosure to push fraudulent sales—often during active administrative procedures. Learn why a Trustee’s Deed of Sale executed by an unauthorized party is void ab initio, transferring neither title nor lien. When your home is held in a private trust, unlawful trustee assignments and forged sales are legally null, and fraud—having no statute of limitations—destroys any claim to validity.

In this episode, uncover how loan servicers weaponize non-judicial foreclosure to push fraudulent sales—often during active administrative procedures. Learn why a Trustee’s Deed of Sale executed by an unauthorized party is void ab initio, transferring neither title nor lien. When your home is held in a private trust, unlawful trustee assignments and forged sales are legally null, and fraud—having no statute of limitations—destroys any claim to validity.

Federal One Trillion Dollar ‘Right to Travel’ and RICO Lawsuit Filed Against Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, Gregory Eastwood, Robert Bowman, William Pratt, and Others

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

A historic $1 trillion federal lawsuit has been filed against Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, Gregory Eastwood, Robert Bowman, William Pratt, and others for violating the right to travel, engaging in racketeering (RICO), fraud, and extortion. The case is built on multiple unrebutted affidavits, which serve as prima facie evidence, legally establishing the defendants’ admission of guilt under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1341, 1951, and RICO statutes. By collateral estoppel, res judicata, and stare decisis, these facts are now irrefutable, and the case moves toward judicial enforcement, asset seizures, and accountability for constitutional violations and financial crimes. Case #5:25−cv−00646−WLH−MAA on the calendar of Article III Judge, Wesley L Hsu

Riverside Federal Court Exposed: Judicial Fraud Confirmed in Kevin Walker Estate vs. Jay Promisco, as Sham Unconstitutional Hearing is Scheduled for March 24, 2025

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate has formally filed a Notice of Judicial Fraud in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339, exposing the Riverside Court’s unconstitutional actions and deliberate obstruction of justice. Despite being placed on notice, the court has refused to cancel its sham hearing or issue the summary judgment required by law. This ongoing judicial fraud violates due process, commercial law, and constitutional protections, proving a deliberate conspiracy against the People’s rights. If the court continues to act in bad faith, Plaintiffs will escalate the matter to higher courts, federal agencies, and criminal oversight bodies. Any ruling issued under fraudulent circumstances is void ab initio and has no legal force.

The Legal Consequences of Ignoring a Conditional Acceptance, Affidavit, or Jurisdictional Challenge: Why Unlawful Orders Are Void Ab Initio: EPISODE 26

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

When a court ignores a Conditional Acceptance, Affidavit, or Challenge of Jurisdiction and proceeds with a hearing or issues an order, it commits a fundamental violation of due process, rendering its actions void ab initio—invalid from the outset—as it lacks lawful authority and jurisdiction.  Legal precedents confirm that unrebutted affidavits stand as truth, and jurisdiction must be proven before any court action. This article explores the legal foundation behind void judgments, fraud upon the court, and how to challenge unlawful rulings. Learn how to invoke U.C.C. § 3-505, Pennoyer v. Neff (1878), and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 to declare a fraudulent order null and enforce your rights.

Riverside, California Federal Court Clerk Returns Money Order for $3.00 Discrepancy in One Trillion “Right to Travel” Lawsuit and Delays Justice

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The U.S. District Court’s rejection of the Kevin Walker Estate’s $402.00 money order—over a minor technicality—raises serious concerns about judicial obstruction and due process violations. Despite the Verified Complaint and exhibits being lawfully filed upon delivery, the Court has delayed docketing under questionable procedural claims. The Kevin Walker Estate has responded by sending a corrected $405.00 money order and making a special deposit with the court’s financial institution to eliminate any further administrative barriers. Case law confirms that clerks have a ministerial duty to accept filings upon delivery, and any refusal constitutes administrative obstruction. If the Court fails to docket the case promptly, further legal action may be taken to hold all responsible parties accountable.

UCC Filing Regions and California’s Unlawful, Unconstitutional, and Cartel-Like Obstruction of Filings

Categories
Business, Constitution, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips, Trust

California’s Secretary of State is unlawfully obstructing UCC filings, falsely citing Government Code § 12181 to deny individuals their commercial rights. This unconstitutional interference violates federal law, including 18 U.S.C. § 242, by depriving filers of due process under color of law. To bypass this corruption, California ns must file in the Colorado UCC region.

Kevin Walker Estate to File Notice of Judicial Fraud Against Riverside Federal Court Judge If Judgment Is Not Issued by March 16, 2025

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Tips

The Kevin Walker Estate is prepared to file a Notice of Judicial Fraud against the Riverside Court if a lawful default and summary judgment is not issued by March 16, 2025. Despite unrebutted affidavits, a Writ of Mandamus, and multiple formal demands, the court remains in dishonor, violating due process, federal law, and commercial statutes. This filing will expose judicial fraud, conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under color of law, holding the court accountable for its refusal to follow established legal procedure. If the court fails to act, the case will be escalated to higher courts, federal authorities, and international bodies for intervention. Justice delayed is justice denied—this is a fight for due process, constitutional supremacy, and commercial enforcement of law.

The Kevin Walker Estate is prepared to file a Notice of Judicial Fraud against the Riverside Court if a lawful default and summary judgment is not issued by March 16, 2025. Despite unrebutted affidavits, a Writ of Mandamus, and multiple formal demands, the court remains in dishonor, violating due process, federal law, and commercial statutes. This filing will expose judicial fraud, conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under color of law, holding the court accountable for its refusal to follow established legal procedure. If the court fails to act, the case will be escalated to higher courts, federal authorities, and international bodies for intervention. Justice delayed is justice denied—this is a fight for due process, constitutional supremacy, and commercial enforcement of law.

Federal Lawsuit Properly Filed, But Clerk’s Office in Riverside, California Seemingly Engaged in Concealment and Tampering

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Tips, Trust

A federal lawsuit has been properly filed in the U.S. District Court, Eastern Division (Riverside, CA), but the clerk’s office is seemingly engaged in concealment, tampering, and obstruction of justice. With all facts legally admitted due to non-rebuttal, judgment is now enforceable. The court must docket the case and comply with federal law immediately.

Wells Fargo’s Obvious Fraud Exposed as Unrebutted Affidavits Demand $1 Billion Summary Judgment

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Wells Fargo faces a Demand for Summary Judgment after failing to rebut sworn affidavits, effectively admitting to fraud, dishonor, and lack of standing. Under California law, summary judgment must be granted as no triable issue of fact exists. The case exposes Wells Fargo’s history of foreclosure fraud, aligning with past rulings where courts dismissed their claims with prejudice. Their silence is a legal admission of guilt, making their claims void ab initio. The court is now required to strike all fraudulent claims and enforce judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

$1.1 Billion Conditional Acceptance Traps Defendants PHH Mortgage in Default as Missing Filings Suddenly Reappear after Writ of Mandamus

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

The Kevin Walker Estate has strategically filed a Conditional Acceptance in response to PHH Mortgage’s Motion to Dismiss, creating a binding contract offer under UCC and contract law. Defendants must now provide verified evidence or face immediate dishonor and default, triggering summary judgment and a $100,000,000 legal award in Plaintiffs’ favor. Adding to the controversy, missing court filings have mysteriously reappeared after Plaintiffs served a Writ of Mandamus, exposing potential judicial misconduct. This case is a critical battle for legal accountability, sovereignty, and due process, forcing courts and corporations to confront their procedural failures. Will the courts uphold the law or expose their corruption?

Kevin Walker Estate Files Historic Affidavit in Federal Court Defending American Sovereignty, private rights, and Constitutional Supremacy

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The right to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is well established in federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and legal precedent. Despite common misconceptions, a trust is a contractual entity that can be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article breaks down the legal foundation supporting this right, key statutory provisions, and how to enforce it against courts and financial institutions that attempt to deny it.

The Kevin Walker Estate has filed a historic legal challenge asserting American sovereignty, constitutional supremacy, and jurisdictional limits. This Verified Affidavit confronts government overreach, legal presumptions, and federal misapplications of law—placing the courts on notice. This case could set a powerful precedent for self-governance, private property rights, and true legal accountability. Will the courts uphold the Constitution, or expose the depth of their corruption?

Riverside, California U.S. District Court Blatantly Complicit in Various Federal Violations: Plaintiffs Demand Justice Against Conspiracy and Defendants’ Illegal and Unlawful Acts

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The case of Kevin Walker Estate, et al. v. Jay Promisco, PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. reveals systemic corruption, legal incompetence, and judicial misconduct. PHH Mortgage, led by attorney Neil J. Cooper, has engaged in fraud, obstruction, and misrepresentation, while the Riverside Federal Court has actively suppressed key filings. Plaintiffs have filed a Verified Demand for criminal enforcement, sanctions, and summary judgment, exposing PHH’s baseless legal tactics. The overturning of the Chevron Doctrine further invalidates PHH’s arguments, proving bad faith litigation. This case is a critical fight against judicial corruption, demanding accountability, due process, and legal sanctions.