Non-judicial foreclosure is an unconstitutional taking that violates due process and property rights by letting private actors seize homes without proving a debt is owed. Banks are often paid twice — or more — through insurance and investor payouts before they foreclose, yet still commit property theft with no courtroom oversight. At the same time, the note and deed are frequently split, destroying any lawful right to enforce foreclosure but ignored in practice. This article exposes how millions lose their homes through a non-judicial system engineered to bypass Constitutional protections and strip homeowners of their rights.
In this episode, uncover how loan servicers weaponize non-judicial foreclosure to push fraudulent sales—often during active administrative procedures. Learn why a Trustee’s Deed of Sale executed by an unauthorized party is void ab initio, transferring neither title nor lien. When your home is held in a private trust, unlawful trustee assignments and forged sales are legally null, and fraud—having no statute of limitations—destroys any claim to validity.
In this episode, uncover how loan servicers weaponize non-judicial foreclosure to push fraudulent sales—often during active administrative procedures. Learn why a Trustee’s Deed of Sale executed by an unauthorized party is void ab initio, transferring neither title nor lien. When your home is held in a private trust, unlawful trustee assignments and forged sales are legally null, and fraud—having no statute of limitations—destroys any claim to validity.
The Plaintiffs in KEVIN WALKER ESTATE, et al. vs. SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al. have delivered an unchallenged demand for One Billion Dollars in default and summary judgment under Rule 56, citing unrebutted affidavits, binding agreements, and procedural dishonor by the Defendants. The Defendants’ silence invokes legal doctrines like stare decisis, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, affirming the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Supported by UCC §§ 1-103, 2-204, 2-206, and 3-505, this case highlights the power of legal maxims and commercial law in ensuring justice. With no genuine dispute of material fact, the Plaintiffs’ claim remains final and enforceable without a hearing
The KEVIN WALKER ESTATE and WALKERNOVA GROUP l have uncovered undeniable fraud, procedural dishonor, and violations of commercial law by Georgia’s Own Credit Union, Quality Loan Service Corporation, Cenlar Federal Savings & Loan, Fidelity National Title Company, and McCarthy & Holthus, LLP. Their verified affidavits and documented evidence confirm the fraud committed and the unlawful attempts to seize property to which these entities have no legal claim. KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is demanding $30 billion in summary judgment, based on fraud, breach of contract, and violations of UCC provisions, contract law, and legal maxims. The facts are clear, and the evidence is unrebutted, demonstrating the fully admitted wrongful actions of these parties.
KEVIN WALKER ESTATE is demanding $30 billion in summary judgment, based on fraud, breach of contract, and violations of UCC provisions, contract law, and legal maxims. The facts are clear, and the evidence is unrebutted, demonstrating the wrongful actions of these parties.
a trustee sale cannot proceed if the property is held in a private trust and the trustee is not involved. Any such sale would lack legal authority and be invalid and equate to fraud. The fraud being committed carries stipulations of 30-50+ years of imprisonment and due a corrupt system Americans are being deprived of their rights. The actions of AFFINIA DEFAULT Services, WELLS FARGO, SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE, and RECON DEFAULT Services go beyond mere procedural errors—they represent a coordinated effort of racketeering, organized crime, and bank fraud. These entities are falsely asserting standing to conduct trustee sales under false pretenses and engaging in slander of title and color of title to unlawfully transfer ownership. Their deliberate misrepresentation of their authority is not only fraudulent but also constitutes treasonous activity, as it undermines the very legal framework that protects property rights and ownership.