Kevin Walker Estate Files Historic Affidavit in Federal Court Defending American Sovereignty, private rights, and Constitutional Supremacy

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The right to represent a trust as an attorney-in-fact is well established in federal law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and legal precedent. Despite common misconceptions, a trust is a contractual entity that can be lawfully represented by an authorized agent, including an attorney-in-fact. This article breaks down the legal foundation supporting this right, key statutory provisions, and how to enforce it against courts and financial institutions that attempt to deny it.

The Kevin Walker Estate has filed a historic legal challenge asserting American sovereignty, constitutional supremacy, and jurisdictional limits. This Verified Affidavit confronts government overreach, legal presumptions, and federal misapplications of law—placing the courts on notice. This case could set a powerful precedent for self-governance, private property rights, and true legal accountability. Will the courts uphold the Constitution, or expose the depth of their corruption?

$1 Billion Default and Summary Judgement Due: Kevin Walker Estate Demands Article III Judge in Federal Court Lawsuit Against Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company

Categories
Constitution, Education, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction

In a monumental legal development, the Kevin Walker Estate v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company case has been removed to federal court and initially assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. However, the Kevin Walker Estate has declined to consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate and formally filed a "Plaintiffs’ Notice of Decline of Consent to Be Heard by a Magistrate Judge and Demand for an Article III Judge." This demand underscores the Plaintiffs’ assertion of their constitutional right to adjudication by a lifetime-appointed federal judge under Article III of the U.S. Constitution

Plaintiffs’ in Billion Dollar Mortgage Fraud, RICO, and Identity Theft Lawsuit Against Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company Demand for Sanctions, Criminal Prosecution, and Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Intangibles, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

The Plaintiffs in KEVIN WALKER ESTATE, et al. vs. SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, et al. have delivered an unchallenged demand for One Billion Dollars in default and summary judgment under Rule 56, citing unrebutted affidavits, binding agreements, and procedural dishonor by the Defendants. The Defendants’ silence invokes legal doctrines like stare decisis, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, affirming the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Supported by UCC §§ 1-103, 2-204, 2-206, and 3-505, this case highlights the power of legal maxims and commercial law in ensuring justice. With no genuine dispute of material fact, the Plaintiffs’ claim remains final and enforceable without a hearing