Nationality vs. Civil Status: Bloodright Sovereignty Beyond “Domicile”

Categories
Business, Constitution, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Trust

This article exposes the deliberate conflation of nationality and domicile by corporate governments to ensnare living men and women into foreign jurisdiction. It explains how nationality is a political inheritance by bloodright, establishing sovereignty beyond statutory “citizenship.” It also shows that civil status is not domicile, but standing sui juris on the land, in equity, as master beneficiary of trust property. By asserting both correctly, one collapses fraudulent presumptions and restores the rightful order: the People as sovereign, government as trustee.

Jurisdiction, Citizenship, and Federal Zones: The Truth Behind Wong Kim Ark and the Buck Act of 1940

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Tips

This article explores the crucial legal distinctions between a State Citizen and a U.S. citizen (14th Amendment subject) by analyzing the Supreme Court case Wong Kim Ark v. United States and the jurisdictional implications of the Buck Act of 1940. It reveals how federal jurisdiction is not based on geography, but on consent and contractual participation in federal benefit programs. Through detailed legal reasoning, it explains how one can owe allegiance to the United States as a constitutional Republic without being subject to its corporate statutory codes. The piece provides actionable remedies for rebutting federal presumptions and restoring lawful State Citizenship.

Why You Should Never Mix Pro Per, Executor, and Attorney-in-Fact Language in Legal Pleadings (and What You CAN Do Lawfully)

Categories
Business, Constitution, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Understanding how to properly assert legal capacity in court is crucial—especially when representing a trust or estate. Many well-meaning plaintiffs unknowingly sabotage their cases by blending fiduciary roles with personal appearances like "pro per" or "in propria persona," triggering instant dismissal. Courts consistently hold that only licensed attorneys may represent legal entities, and failing to distinguish roles invites confusion and legal rejection. This article breaks down what combinations are lawful, what mistakes to avoid, and how to protect your standing by appearing strictly in a fiduciary capacity. It’s not just about getting heard—it’s about being recognized with legal force and precision.