The 13th and 14th Amendments did not end slavery — they reinvented it. The 13th merely outlawed involuntary servitude, leaving voluntary contractual servitude intact, while the 14th created an entirely new class of federal “citizens of the United States” — statutory legal fictions (ens legis) owned by the corporate government. Through licenses, registrations, and signatures, living men and women are presumed to consent to act as sureties for these corporate entities, forfeiting their inherent rights for revocable privileges. Slavery wasn’t abolished — it was rebranded as citizenship.
Discover the shocking truth behind America’s hidden transformation. Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 exposes how the Judicial Improvements Act quietly dismantled constitutional courts and replaced them with corporate administrative tribunals. Judges who were once independent arbiters of law are now statutory employees enforcing policy—not the Constitution. This report traces the bait-and-switch that erased judicial power, stripped due process, and left every American at the mercy of a corporate trust system masquerading as justice. A must-read for anyone seeking to understand why real law no longer exists in U.S. courts.
This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
The Declaration of Independence is not just patriotic history — it is a signed, binding contract and trust agreement. It establishes government as trustee, the people as beneficiaries, and unalienable rights as the trust corpus to be secured. Unlike later constitutional language about “citizens,” the Declaration protects men and women directly, as living beings endowed by their Creator with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It remains organic law and superior authority, giving the people both the right and the duty to resist and abolish any government that breaches its trust.
Riverside County officials, deputies, and unlicensed “commissioners” are now in verified default, dishonor, and commercial liability for unrebutted RICO, fraud, and color-of-law crimes. Kevin: Realworldfare has removed case MISW2501134 to federal court, triggering lien enforcement and formal demand for disclosure of liability bonds. Evidence includes unrebutted affidavits, a $1 trillion commercial lien, and documented bond fraud by inactive attorneys Jeremiah Raxter and Charles Rogers. Federal claims include kidnapping, extortion, impersonation, and deprivation of rights under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242, 1961–1964. Brady-listed deputies remain under active investigation. If justice is not delivered, top national officials will be named in new federal actions for willful neglect and complicity.
This article explores the crucial legal distinctions between a State Citizen and a U.S. citizen (14th Amendment subject) by analyzing the Supreme Court case Wong Kim Ark v. United States and the jurisdictional implications of the Buck Act of 1940. It reveals how federal jurisdiction is not based on geography, but on consent and contractual participation in federal benefit programs. Through detailed legal reasoning, it explains how one can owe allegiance to the United States as a constitutional Republic without being subject to its corporate statutory codes. The piece provides actionable remedies for rebutting federal presumptions and restoring lawful State Citizenship.
This minimalist legal graphic showcases Canon 2055 and Canon 2056, foundational principles in equity and trust law. Canon 2055 affirms that a legal fiction cannot own property, while Canon 2056 declares that unrebutted claims in the public record stand as law. The clean, centered design emphasizes the gravity and simplicity of these doctrines. Though not codified in statutory law, these canons govern how presumptions, trusts, and legal identity function within commercial and administrative systems. This image is ideal for educational or advocacy use in private law and sovereignty discussions.
Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani have engaged in a criminal racketeering enterprise in Riverside County, California, committing fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under color of law. Rogers and Raxter, both inactive and unauthorized to practice law, unlawfully acted as judicial officers, issuing void orders and illegal warrants. Vermani knowingly pursued fraudulent prosecutions despite clear constitutional violations, further implicating her under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and RICO 18 U.S.C. § 1962. Their coordinated acts constitute felonies and establish a pattern of racketeering activity subject to immediate federal civil rights and criminal actions. All fraudulent obligations have been assigned to the Treasury under UCC 1-308 and 31 U.S.C. § 3123, and full prosecution and sanctions are being pursued.
Kevin Walker has filed a groundbreaking $1 trillion federal lawsuit against Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, District Attorney Michael Hestrin, and multiple officials, alleging a conspiracy involving fraud, kidnapping, identity theft, and racketeering under color of law. The amended complaint, filed on April 17, 2025, proceeds solely in Walker’s name and is backed by unrebutted affidavits, UCC liens, and verified commercial defaults. Among the charges are violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1341, and 1962, as well as constitutional deprivations of due process and property rights. This case challenges the legitimacy of statutory enforcement practices and asserts equity, trust law, and secured party protections. If successful, it could set a national precedent for private remedies against public actors abusing administrative power.
Equitable Subrogation along with Natural Law and Trust Law is the Remedy to Stop the Unjust Enrichment. It is for the "Restitution" of our Private God Given Rights which is our PROPERTY. Subrogation means "Substitution". That’s what the Banksters and the Fictional "STATE" did to our Mothers when they were "deceived" into "Registering" our PROPERTY — Our Equitable Rights and Remedies were Subrogated/Substituted.
Discover how equity protects real property interests when formal contracts are bypassed but performance and acceptance occur. This article explores how a broker’s conduct — such as accepting a tendered offer and delisting a property — can create equitable title, even without a deed. Learn how to secure your equitable interest through affidavits, lawful tender, UCC filings, and quiet title actions. Equity enforces what the law may overlook — when you act in honor and truth.
Understanding how to properly assert legal capacity in court is crucial—especially when representing a trust or estate. Many well-meaning plaintiffs unknowingly sabotage their cases by blending fiduciary roles with personal appearances like "pro per" or "in propria persona," triggering instant dismissal. Courts consistently hold that only licensed attorneys may represent legal entities, and failing to distinguish roles invites confusion and legal rejection. This article breaks down what combinations are lawful, what mistakes to avoid, and how to protect your standing by appearing strictly in a fiduciary capacity. It’s not just about getting heard—it’s about being recognized with legal force and precision.