In a significant legal filing, ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© ESTATE and ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© IRR TRUST (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have moved for a summary judgment of $2.975 billion against San Diego County Credit Union and multiple associated defendants, including Alejandro Moreno, Shannon Peterson, Teresa H. Campbell, Shirley Jackson, Sheryl Flaugher, Nathan Schmidt, Carolyn Kissick, Ryan Little, Scott Carroll, Rubie Donaghy, and SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP. Plaintiffs assert that by signing, considering, and accepting specified contracts and affidavits, these defendants have assumed the financial liabilities detailed in Plaintiffs’ claims and relevant laws.
Acting as trustees, fiduciaries, and ‘holders in due course’ of all relevant assets, ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© ESTATE and ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© IRR TRUST file this claim as Real Parties in Interest. The assets in question, including a 2018 GMC Sierra 1500 (VIN #xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), as well as those specified in UCC1 and UCC3 filings attached to the complaint, are legally held by Plaintiffs, with no lawful claim or standing by the defendants. Ownership and title are registered with the Nevada Secretary of State, affirming Plaintiffs’ position as the rightful holders.
Contractual Agreement Established Through Unrebutted Affidavits
Plaintiffs submitted a notarized, self-executing Contract and Security Agreement (Exhibit E), received and accepted by Defendants under Registered Mail #RFxxxxxxxxxUS. The defendants’ silence and lack of response constitute tacit acquiescence under contract law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), forming a binding agreement that supports the $2.975 billion summary judgment in Plaintiffs’ favor. This agreement is further documented by an INVOICE/TRUE BILL (#SANDIEGOCREDITDISHONOR24), specifying the defendants’ obligations.
Verified Commercial Affidavits Confirm Plaintiffs’ Creditor Status
Verified commercial affidavits, delivered to Defendants and unchallenged, underscore Plaintiffs’ standing as sole creditors. These affidavits outline ownership and the obligations of Defendants, with USPS receipt verification (Forms 3811) evidencing delivery. The affidavits, including those labeled as Exhibits E, F, H, and J, itemize Defendants’ defaults, confirming Plaintiffs’ claims as binding and legally indisputable under commercial law.
Summary Judgment and Lien Confirmation Against Defendants
Plaintiffs’ UCC § 9-509 filings with the Nevada Secretary of State substantiate a lien confirming their entitlement to the $2.975 billion liability. Contract and statutory law together establish Defendants as debtors in this matter, while Plaintiffs hold clear creditor rights.
- Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(a): Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The unrebutted affidavits submitted by Plaintiff(s) establish that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute, and Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment based on the evidence presented and as a matter of law.
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(c): Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The unrebutted affidavits submitted by Plaintiff(s) demonstrate that no triable issues of material fact remain in dispute, and Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment based on the evidence presented and as a matter of law.
- Res Judicata, Stare Decisis, and Collateral Estoppel: The principles of res judicata, stare decisis, and collateral estoppel apply to the unrebutted affidavits, establishing that all issues are deemed settled and cannot be contested further. These principles reinforce the finality of the administrative findings and support the granting of summary judgment.
Tender of Payment and Dollar-for-Dollar Discharge
A certified BILL OF EXCHANGE (Exhibit K), presented in good faith as a tender of payment, was rejected by Defendants, resulting in a discharge per UCC § 3-603. This tender complies with UCC § 3-311, providing for full satisfaction of all claims, and mandates a dollar-for-dollar discharge under UCC §§ 3-104 and 3-603 and House Joint Resolution 192 of 1933 (Public Law 73-10). Plaintiffs’ registered Discharge and Indemnity Bond of $200 billion (Exhibit RFxxxxxxxxxUS) further secures full indemnity.
Legal Maxims and Precedent
- An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce (12 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15).
- An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce (Heb. 6:16-17).
- Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit (Lev. 5:4-5; Mat. 5:33; James 5:12).
- In commerce, truth is sovereign (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; John 8:32).
- The workman is worthy of his hire (Exodus 20:15; Luke 10:7).
“Statements of fact contained in affidavits which are not rebutted… may be accepted as true by the trial court.” — Winsett v. Donaldson, 244 N.W.2d 355 (Mich. 1976).
Conclusion: Summary Judgment in Favor of ™STEVEN MACARTHUR BROOKS ESTATE
Based on binding agreements, commercial affidavits, and statutory duties, Plaintiffs argue that Defendants must satisfy the $2.975 billion judgment. Plaintiffs’ role as creditors is uncontested, establishing this judgment as mandated by law. ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© ESTATE and ™STEVEN MACARTHUR-BROOKS© IRR TRUST seek the Court’s confirmation of summary judgment to enforce this claim.
This case highlights the enforceability of binding agreements and affidavits, setting a precedent for contractual obligation and creditor rights in finance and property law.
