California — May 2025 — Alarming evidence has surfaced in Kevin: Walker v. Chad Bianco et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-00646-WLH-MAA, before Judge Wesley Hsu and Magistrate Maria Audero, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. A VERIFIED Affidavit asserting constitutional authority, federal jurisdictional limits, and national/State Citizen status — along with over 28 supporting exhibits — was lawfully delivered and signed for on April 30, 2025, per USPS Tracking No. ER157615945US. Despite irrefutable delivery and public service on all parties, this key filing has yet to appear on the official docket.
This pattern raises concern but may — for now — be attributed to clerical delay or court workload, as Judge Hsu and Magistrate Audero are presently being extended the benefit of the doubt. However, continued inaction or failure to docket will no longer be interpreted as benign if not remedied promptly. Transparency, due process, and acknowledgment of sworn legal filings are non-negotiable constitutional obligations.
Systemic Concealment and a Growing Crisis in California’s Judiciary
This incident is not occurring in a vacuum. It resembles repeated acts under Judge Jesus G. Bernal, where affidavits and notices rebutting 14th Amendment “U.S. citizen” presumption and asserting State Citizenship and private legal standing were similarly withheld from record, effectively obstructing judicial remedy.
In fact, in a separate but directly related matter, Case No.5:25-cv-00339, Judge Bernal falsely claimed that Kevin: Walker had never responded to motions—despite filed and timestamped responses. Bernal used this knowingly false assertion of “non-response” as a fraudulent basis to dismiss the case in direct violation of judicial ethics and due process. That case is currently on appeal, with the appeal citing Bernal’s deliberate misrepresentation and failure to acknowledge the record.
Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law
The affidavit — executed under penalty of perjury in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 — establishes Kevin: Walker’s status as a non-citizen national and State Citizen as recognized by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(21) and (22).
- –(21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.
- – (22)(B)“The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.”
It rebuts presumptions of federal corporate jurisdiction, statutory adhesion, and compelled performance under commercial code. The filing also included comprehensive UCC filings, affidavits of non-residency, passport evidence, copyright/trademark protections, and notice of constitutional immunity.
Failure to properly acknowledge and record this filing potentially implicates the following U.S. Codes:
- 18 U.S.C. § 2071 – Concealment or removal of public records,
- 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) – Obstruction of official proceedings,
- 18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy against rights,
- 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law,
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil action for deprivation of rights,
- 28 U.S.C. § 455 – Mandatory judicial disqualification where impartiality is reasonably questioned.
Formal Actions Imminent if Record Remains Obstructed
While Walker’s team maintains that this delay may be clerical or administrative in nature, continued omission will trigger a sequence of escalating remedies. These include:
- A formal complaint to the California Commission on Judicial Performance,
- Filing of a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and
- A demand for immediate intervention from oversight agencies.
If necessary, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and officials at the Department of Justice will be named as derivatively liable for failure to act in their capacity to enforce constitutional protections. Silence in the face of lawful filings, when paired with continued railroading and concealment, will be viewed as tacit complicity in conspiracy and obstruction.
California’s Federal Courts: A Legal Quagmire of Misconduct and Railroading
California courts — particularly in Riverside and Los Angeles Counties — are increasingly viewed as hotbeds of judicial misconduct, statutory overreach, and unconstitutional administrative enforcement. Systematic refusal to recognize private standing, delay of time-sensitive filings, and selective docket manipulation are all indicators of intentional suppression of lawful redress.
Such conduct, if confirmed, constitutes not only fraud upon the court, but a coordinated deprivation of constitutional and trust law protections afforded to those standing as nationals and State Citizens under the original Constitution — not corporate policy.
Criminal RICO Syndicate in Riverside County, California: How Lawyers Posing as “Judges,” Clerks, and Deputies Form an Ongoing Enterprise of Fraud, Obstruction, and Human Rights Violations — 42 USC 1984, 18 USC 241-242, RICO, Extortion and more
Judicial Railroading and Fraud in Riverside, California: Attorney/Fake Fraudulent “Judge”/Commissioner Tamara L. Wagner (CA Bar #188613) Named in RICO-Based Federal Removal for Practicing Law from the Bench and Orchestrating Fraudulent Proceedings
Final Notice and Demand for Remedy
If the affidavit and evidence remain obstructed or ignored, Kevin: Walker and his counsel will seek:
- Writ of Mandamus,
- Sanctions and summary judgment, and
- Federal prosecution under the Clearfield Doctrine, which strips government actors of immunity when engaging in commercial or administrative activities.
The record has been lawfully served. The People are watching. Judicial integrity is now on trial
