The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.
states, counties, cities, and sheriffs operate not as true governments but as corporate franchises under color of law. What appears as lawful authority is instead commercial administration, where statutes function like corporate bylaws. Through birth certificates, licenses, and parens patriae, people are reduced to ens legis fictions and compelled into adhesion contracts without consent. The entire structure is fraud by design—de facto corporations masquerading as de jure government. Fraud vitiates all it touches, rendering the system void from inception and without legitimacy
This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the Central District of California continues to issue orders after permanent disqualification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455, and Rule 63, in flagrant defiance of black-letter law. Despite verified affidavits, unrebutted filings, pending Ninth Circuit appeals, and a Bill in Equity and Writ of Mandamus before the Supreme Court, she has unlawfully gagged the Real Party in Interest, Kevin: Realworldfare, and dismissed all claims without jurisdiction.
Her actions are not “judicial error” but fraud, obstruction, and treason against Article III, evidenced by void “text-only” dismissals, suppression of verified evidence, and impersonation of judicial authority. With all cases now on appeal and the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction imminent, the judiciary faces a stark choice: enforce the Constitution or ratify judicial treason.
Every State operates as a corporation—its Constitution is the charter, its House and Senate act as the board of directors, and its statutes function as bylaws. Citizens are treated as franchise participants through licenses, registrations, and contracts, while States issue bonds and securitize debt like any other business. This hidden corporate structure reveals the true commercial character of “government.” Learn more at Realworldfare.com.
The Declaration of Independence is not just patriotic history — it is a signed, binding contract and trust agreement. It establishes government as trustee, the people as beneficiaries, and unalienable rights as the trust corpus to be secured. Unlike later constitutional language about “citizens,” the Declaration protects men and women directly, as living beings endowed by their Creator with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It remains organic law and superior authority, giving the people both the right and the duty to resist and abolish any government that breaches its trust.
A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.
A historic constitutional and RICO-based legal action is being prepared for filing directly in the U.S. Supreme Court under original jurisdiction. The complaint names federal judges, California officials, and courts as defendants in an alleged conspiracy involving fraud, racketeering, and systemic violations of due process, civil rights, and commercial law. Plaintiff Kevin: Realworldfare asserts the collapse of lawful jurisdiction in both state and federal courts. This case challenges the legitimacy of simulated legal process, judicial treason, and denial of remedy. The Supreme Court is now called upon to intervene at the highest level.
Ask ChatGPT
A Verified Constitutional Challenge has been filed by Kevin: Realworldfare exposing systemic judicial obstruction, unconstitutional policies, and the Ninth Circuit’s open defiance of Rule 17 and 28 U.S.C. § 1654. The fraud began with District Judge Jesus G. Bernal’s unlawful dismissal based on fabricated procedural grounds, despite verified filings and lawful standing. Now the Ninth Circuit is compounding the coverup, enforcing BAR monopoly policy over constitutional rights. This article documents the collapse of lawful process, the concealment of fraud, and the active betrayal of the Constitution by federal judicial officers. The record is undeniable—and the challenge is on file.
This article exposes the legal power of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 removals and the non-discretionary appellate review authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). When a case is removed to federal court on civil rights grounds, federal jurisdiction attaches immediately—and any remand issued without adjudicating those rights is void. The article outlines how fraudulent remand orders, especially when combined with fabricated party substitutions, violate due process and trigger mandatory reversal. This is a must-read for anyone asserting federal protections in hostile state forums.
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, a federal judge in the Central District of California, is now under intense scrutiny for ruling on her own disqualification in three separate cases, despite verified affidavits of bias, fraud, and constitutional violations. All affected cases are currently on appeal, including a pending Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and re-removal actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Evidence shows Sykes acted ultra vires, impersonated lawful authority, and obstructed justice under color of law. A federal civil rights and Bivens lawsuit is imminent. This article exposes the full extent of her judicial misconduct and outlines the coming legal consequences.
Ask ChatGPT
In a shocking act of judicial fraud and procedural sabotage, U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez entered a void Final Judgment in a verified civil rights and equity case—without adjudicating jurisdiction and in defiance of Rule 60(b)(4). The court ignored multiple unrebutted affidavits and relied solely on an unsigned, unsworn, and procedurally defective motion submitted by defense counsel Carin Silberman of Silberman Law Firm, PLLC. The record proves service was perfected, jurisdiction was never challenged, and summary judgment was pending—yet the case was dismissed under false pretenses. This is not a legal error; it is a deliberate conspiracy to obstruct justice, suppress lawful remedy, and protect financial defendants through collusion. The Plaintiff has filed a Verified Motion to Vacate, and federal escalation is now underway.