The Hidden Bonding System in Every Ticket and Court Case: How Judges, Clerks, and Courts Monetize Cases Through Bonds and Securities and Steal from the People

Categories
Business, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Every court case in the United States is monetized through bid, performance, and payment bonds, converted into securities under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042 and invested through CRIS with CUSIP identifiers. By law, 12 U.S.C. § 411 confirms Federal Reserve notes are obligations of the United States, while 18 U.S.C. § 8 defines bonds, notes, and securities as “obligations or other securities of the United States.” Asserting status as real party in interest and secured party creditor is essential, because under UCC § 9-315(a)(1), a perfected security interest continues in collateral despite any transfer or disposition. Judges and clerks, acting as corporate sureties under 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, conceal financial conflicts requiring disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455. Since 1933, all obligations have been discharged in credit, making courtrooms bonded, securitized, and monetized enterprises — unless the secured party reclaims the funds.

The Individual Master File, Non-Master File, and the Ens Legis: How the System Tracks the U.S. Citizen Franchise

Categories
Business, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

The IRS’s Individual Master File (IMF) and Non-Master File (NMF) are not just accounting ledgers — they are the full commercial records of your ens legis (the “U.S. citizen” corporate franchise). These files track liens, credits, offsets, securities, and every transaction tied to the statutory entity, not the living man or woman. Backed by 26 U.S.C. § 6103, Treasury regulations, and federal fiduciary authority under 31 U.S.C. § 321, the IMF/NMF system proves that the government manages you as a corporate ward. Like Title 25 trustee powers over Native estates, Treasury acts as trustee over your legal fiction. Once you see this, the distinction between public franchise and private status becomes undeniable.

The United States Is a Corporation, the “U.S. Citizen” Is a Federal Franchise Business, and the Social Security Number Belongs to the Franchise — Not the Man or Woman

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

This article exposes the undeniable legal framework: the United States is a Federal corporation, and the “U.S. citizen” is a business franchise created under that corporate system. Statutes and case law confirm that the Social Security number belongs only to the franchise — not to the private man or woman. Compelling disclosure or use of an SSN outside of employment or tax purposes is a felony under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8). From the Buck Act to Kitchens v. Steele, the record is clear: forcing SSNs in private contracts is unlawful coercion into a federal franchise.

Appeal Briefs & Rule 27 Motions Filed in Case Nos. 25-5113 and 25-4877 Exposing Undeniable Fraud, Peonage, Estate Robbery, and Theft: Sunshine S. Sykes, California Courts, and the Ninth Circuit’s Complicity Without Jurisdiction

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

California’s federal courts and the Ninth Circuit are running a theater of fraud — ignoring jurisdiction, striking verified filings, and sustaining slavery to debts already discharged. Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes, disqualified by law, continued to rule without authority, while the Ninth Circuit now appears complicit in preserving fraud and peonage under color of law. Every affidavit, deed, and UCC filing remains unrebutted and admitted, yet due process and the Bill of Rights are trampled. Fraud vitiates everything — and the entire record proves these proceedings are void ab initio. — The Supreme Court is next and a lawsuit againt the State of California, Gavin Newsom, Rob Bonta, Sunshine Sykes, Tamara Wagner, and every actor/trustee/fiduciary/fraudster involved in one BIG rico lawsuit demanding criminal prosecution.

Unrebutted Affidavits stand as Truth and become the Judgment, and Silence is Confession because all Court proceedings are commerce — Judicial Immunity is Removed when “Judges” ignore Unrebutted Affidavits

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Trust

Discover the unstoppable power of unrebutted affidavits — the most overlooked yet decisive weapon in law. This guide proves that under FRCP, CFR, and binding precedent, unrebutted affidavits stand as admitted truth and demand judgment by law. When judges ignore them, they abandon jurisdiction, immunity, and lawful authority — exposing themselves as private actors under the Clearfield Doctrine. Master the rules, maxims, and case law that transform silence into default and default into judgment. Perfect for anyone seeking to enforce rights with precision, finality, and commercial leverage.

Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 — 1989 Judicial Improvements Act

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Discover the shocking truth behind America’s hidden transformation. Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 exposes how the Judicial Improvements Act quietly dismantled constitutional courts and replaced them with corporate administrative tribunals. Judges who were once independent arbiters of law are now statutory employees enforcing policy—not the Constitution. This report traces the bait-and-switch that erased judicial power, stripped due process, and left every American at the mercy of a corporate trust system masquerading as justice. A must-read for anyone seeking to understand why real law no longer exists in U.S. courts.

The Ninth Circuit Brief That Blows the Lid Off Judicial Fraud and Collusion by Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and John and Therese Bailey

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

The Ninth Circuit Opening Brief filed by Kevin: Realworldfare unmasks a scheme of judicial fraud and collusion by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and opposing counsel. Sykes ruled on her own disqualification, issued a fraudulent remand order while jurisdictionally dead, and colluded to suppress verified affidavits while elevating unverified hearsay to judgment. The unlawful detainer was void from inception, every order she issued is void ab initio, and fraud vitiates everything—leaving the Ninth Circuit with the duty to vacate all orders and restore rights.

When Judges Act Without Jurisdiction = Void Orders, No Immunity, Full Personal Liability, Judicial Usurpation, Ultra Vires Acts, Judicial Treason, and Commercial Fraud

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

Judges are not immune when they act outside lawful jurisdiction. Under the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, […]

All Obligations Are Securities and Lawfully Discharged by Indorsement Under HJR-192 of 1933 Public Law 73-10, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3123 and 5118, 31 C.F.R. Part 328, and UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-311

Categories
Business, Constitution, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Discover the hidden foundation of the modern financial system: all obligations are securities, and all debts are discharged — not paid — by indorsement and operation of law. This powerful article exposes how HJR-192 of 1933 abolished gold payment, converting every transaction into credit-based discharge under UCC and federal statutes. Learn how Federal Reserve Notes are mere debt instruments, how every obligation is held in trust as a security, and how a properly indorsed instrument lawfully settles any debt. Essential knowledge for asserting your rights, enforcing discharge, and holding fiduciaries accountable for commercial dishonor.

The Peace Flag, the War Flag, and the Gold-Fringed Flag: Jurisdiction Hidden in Plain Sight

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article explains how the Peace Flag, War Flag, and Gold-Fringed Flag each mark the rules of the forum in which you stand. The Peace Flag signals civil jurisdiction of the People, with constitutional protections intact. The War Flag represents military jurisdiction and emergency powers, where rights are reduced to privileges. The Gold-Fringed Flag designates admiralty or tribunal jurisdiction, applying corporate statutes and procedures under color of law. Flags declare the forum’s operating rules, not who you are as a man or woman.

state Citizen aka One of the People vs. “citizen of the United States” (sole proprietor/estate/ens legis): The 14th Amendment Divide Between the “United States” (federal corporation) and the “united states of America” (sovereign states)

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Remedy, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This document examines the critical shift in American citizenship created by the 14th Amendment. Before 1868, a Citizen (capital C) referred to a state Citizensovereign members of the de jure body politic of the several states, recognized as one of the People. The 14th Amendment introduced a new statutory “citizen of the United States,” a federal ens legis fiction tied to corporate jurisdiction rather than inherent sovereignty. By distinguishing between Citizen, state Citizen, “citizen of the United States,” and one of the People, this study clarifies how rights were transformed from unalienable to regulated privileges.

Ninth Circuit Caught Ignoring Its Own Test on Mandamus Proceedings: Denies Mandamus While Bauman Factors Were Filed and Proven

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Trust

The Ninth Circuit just denied a petition for writ of mandamus using a boilerplate excuse that the Bauman factors weren’t satisfied — even though a verified supplemental brief applying each factor was filed into the case. Verified Rule 27 motions and unrebutted affidavits proved mandatory disqualification, void remands, and irreparable harm, yet the court ignored its own test. This isn’t adjudication; it’s judicial fraud by omission. The denial itself proves the corruption: the Ninth Circuit refuses to follow the very rules it claims to apply.