VERIFIED COMPLAINT FILED WITH Pam Bondi THE STATE BAR, Donald Trump, AND Jim Jordan: Demanding Impeachment, Investigation, and Exposing the Coordinated Federal Judicial Treason of Judge Sunshine S. Sykes and The Bailey Legal Group

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust

A verified criminal complaint exposes a coordinated racketeering scheme inside the Central District of California and the Ninth Circuit, involving Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and attorneys John and Therese Bailey. Supported by unrebutted affidavits and documentary proof, the record alleges fraud upon the court, obstruction of justice, impersonation of federal authority, and deprivation of rights under color of law. The complaint demands immediate impeachment, disbarment, and federal prosecution of the actors involved.

BREAKING: Landmark RICO and Constitutional Complaint Prepared for Filing in U.S. Supreme Court by Kevin: Realworldfare Naming Federal Judges Sunshine Sykes, Wesley Hsu, Kenly Kato, Otis D Wright, Jesus G Bernal, Dolly M Gee, Michael Fitzgerald, California State Officials, and Courts in Historic Original Jurisdiction Challenge

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

A historic constitutional and RICO-based legal action is being prepared for filing directly in the U.S. Supreme Court under original jurisdiction. The complaint names federal judges, California officials, and courts as defendants in an alleged conspiracy involving fraud, racketeering, and systemic violations of due process, civil rights, and commercial law. Plaintiff Kevin: Realworldfare asserts the collapse of lawful jurisdiction in both state and federal courts. This case challenges the legitimacy of simulated legal process, judicial treason, and denial of remedy. The Supreme Court is now called upon to intervene at the highest level.

Ask ChatGPT

Mandatory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) in Civil Rights Removals: The Federal Backstop to State-Level Judicial Abuse

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns

This article exposes the legal power of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 removals and the non-discretionary appellate review authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). When a case is removed to federal court on civil rights grounds, federal jurisdiction attaches immediately—and any remand issued without adjudicating those rights is void. The article outlines how fraudulent remand orders, especially when combined with fabricated party substitutions, violate due process and trigger mandatory reversal. This is a must-read for anyone asserting federal protections in hostile state forums.

TEXAS Federal Court Fraud Exposed: Dishonorable Judge/Attorney Xavier Rodriguez and Attorney Carin Groh with SILBERMAN LAW firm caught in due process violations and fraud

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns

In a shocking act of judicial fraud and procedural sabotage, U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez entered a void Final Judgment in a verified civil rights and equity case—without adjudicating jurisdiction and in defiance of Rule 60(b)(4). The court ignored multiple unrebutted affidavits and relied solely on an unsigned, unsworn, and procedurally defective motion submitted by defense counsel Carin Silberman of Silberman Law Firm, PLLC. The record proves service was perfected, jurisdiction was never challenged, and summary judgment was pending—yet the case was dismissed under false pretenses. This is not a legal error; it is a deliberate conspiracy to obstruct justice, suppress lawful remedy, and protect financial defendants through collusion. The Plaintiff has filed a Verified Motion to Vacate, and federal escalation is now underway.

Judicial Conflicts of Interest: How Foreclosures Fund the Judge’s Retirement

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article exposes the brutal truth: judges across America are financially incentivized to rule against homeowners because their pensions are funded by mortgage-backed securities and foreclosure profits. Every time a family is evicted, a judge’s retirement account grows—turning the courtroom into a foreclosure mill for Wall Street. This isn’t speculation—it’s documented in CAFRs, SEC filings, and pension fund reports. Judicial impartiality is a lie; the bench is bought, the system is rigged, and due process is dead. If you think you’re getting a fair trial in a property case, you’re already the mark.

Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes Recused by Law on Three (3) Cases — Yet Continues to Obstruct Justice in Multiple Federal Civil Rights Cases

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Federal Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes has been automatically disqualified under 28 U.S.C. § 144 upon the filing of verified affidavits alleging bias, fraud, and obstruction—yet she unlawfully continues to act without jurisdiction. Her inaction on dispositive motions and tolerance of fabricated pleadings constitute judicial treason, color of law violations, and estate theft. This article exposes her pattern of misconduct, procedural sabotage, and rebellion against the Constitution, with imminent escalation to the Ninth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court.

How to Recuse a Federal Judge — And Why It’s Mandatory and They Must Step Down Immediately Under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 455

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

Learn how to lawfully recuse a biased federal judge using 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455. Once a verified motion and affidavit are filed, disqualification is immediate, mandatory, and strips the judge of all jurisdiction. Any continued action by that judge is ultra vires and void ab initio. This article exposes the legal authority behind automatic recusal and outlines your remedies if the judge refuses to step down.

Ask ChatGPT

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed with Ninth Circuit — Treason from the Bench: How Judge Otis D. Wright II Denied Due Process, Obstructed Federal Jurisdiction, and Committed Fraud Upon the Court

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

This explosive exposé reveals how U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II unlawfully struck verified federal filings, obstructed civil rights removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), and defamed the Petitioner as a "sovereign citizen" without cause. The article details a pattern of judicial fraud, denial of due process, and unconstitutional party substitution—all under color of law. A Verified Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus has now been filed with the Ninth Circuit to vacate the void order and demand full dismissal. This is a critical case of federal overreach, judicial misconduct, and systemic abuse.

EXPOSING JUDICIAL FRAUD: How a Federal Judge Otis D. Wright, II Ignored Civil Rights Law, Violated Due Process, and Tried to Bury a Federal Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust, Wealth

A federal judge’s July 2025 order is now under fire for unlawfully striking a removal, misapplying criminal statutes, ignoring unrebutted affidavits, and participating in a fraudulent party substitution. The case, originally removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1), involves severe allegations of constitutional violations, jurisdictional fraud, and due process abuse. Despite clear legal precedent barring time limits on § 1443 removals, the court falsely claimed the removal was untimely and smeared the petitioner with defamatory labels. This article exposes the judicial misconduct, factual distortions, and illegality underlying the void order now being challenged.

EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT MANDAMUS VANISHES: Ninth Circuit Fraud, Tampering, Judicial Collusion, and a Federal Cover-Up Seems Unequivocal

Categories
Constitution, Education, Equity, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Sovereigns, Trust, Wealth

Federal courts are now under scrutiny after a verified Writ of Mandamus vanished from the Ninth Circuit docket without explanation—raising grave concerns of judicial tampering, fraud, and systemic misconduct. Judge Sunshine Sykes defied clear jurisdictional divestiture by issuing rulings on a matter under appellate review, violating 28 U.S.C. § 144 and § 1651. This article exposes a disturbing pattern of ultra vires acts, denial of due process, and potential RICO violations implicating both district and appellate judges.Ask ChatGPT

When the Debt Is Discharged but the LIEN Remains: Why Auto and Home Loan Lenders Who Ignore Lawful Tender Are Committing Fraud and Commercial Crimes

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Sovereigns, Strawman/Artifical Entity/Legal Fiction, Trust

This article delivers a devastating legal breakdown proving that lawful tender—once made and unrebutted—discharges auto loan debt under UCC §§ 3-601, 3-603, 3-310, 2-206, and 1-103, as codified in Cal. Com. Code §§ 3601, 3603, 3310, 2206, 1103, Fla. Stat. §§ 673.6011, 673.6031, 673.3101, 672.206, 671.103, and N.C.G.S. §§ 25-3-601, 25-3-603, 25-3-310, 25-2-206, 25-1-103. It exposes refusal to release a lien after lawful discharge as actionable fraud, conversion, embezzlement, and obstruction under state and federal law. With verified case law and commercial principles, it explains how silence equals acceptance and how creditors become commercially estopped. A must-read for secured parties, fiduciaries, and equity claimants demanding lien removal, declaratory relief, and commercial remedy.

How a Perfected Security Agreement and UCC Filings Strip Servicers of Foreclosure Rights

Categories
Business, Constitution, Education, Equity, Intangibles, Law/Legal, News, Realworldfare, Remedy, Securities, Trust, Wealth

A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.