A federal lawsuit has been properly filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division (Riverside), and is currently awaiting docketing in accordance with the law and court procedure. However, serious irregularities have already emerged, as the clerk’s office has engaged in document concealment, mutilation, and tampering, violating fundamental due process rights and obstructing the administration of justice.
The lawsuit, Walker Estate v. Sheriff, et al., includes claims for fraud, breach of contract, extortion, kidnapping, bank fraud, racketeering, and deprivation of rights under color of law, among other severe allegations. Under federal law and established legal precedent, all facts presented in the Verified Complaint are now deemed admitted and uncontested, as no rebuttal has been provided by the named defendants. The failure to docket the case in a timely and transparent manner raises serious concerns about corruption, misconduct, and obstruction of justice within the court’s administrative operations.
Federal Lawsuit Properly Filed and Meets All Procedural Requirements
The Walker Estate has properly filed a federal complaint against multiple defendants, including:
- Chad Bianco (Riverside County Sheriff)
- Menifee Justice Center
- Ferguson Praet & Sherman, A Professional Corporation
- Other individuals and agencies complicit in fraudulent and unlawful acts
The complaint was sent via Registered Mail (#RF775823821US) on March 5, 2025, in full compliance with federal rules of civil procedure. Plaintiffs have provided all necessary documentation, exhibits, and notarized affidavits, establishing uncontested evidence of fraud, coercion, and unlawful deprivation of rights by the named defendants.
Delivered, Left with Individual, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501, March 11, 2025, 12:59 pm.
Screen Shot 2025 03 14 at 10.23.34 AM
Despite fulfilling all procedural filing requirements, the clerk’s office has thus far, failed to docket the case properly, seemingly engaging in acts of concealment and tampering, which directly violate federal law and the constitutional right to access the courts.
Clerk’s Office Caught in Document Tampering and Concealment
The failure to docket a properly filed case does not appear to b an administrative error— but instead ia deliberate act of misconduct designed to obstruct justice. The clerk’s office in the Eastern Division (Riverside) has already demonstrated bad faith, engaging in the following unlawful acts:
- Concealment of Court Filings – The lawsuit, which should have been publicly docketed, has not appeared on the record, raising concerns that court staff are unlawfully withholding documents.
- Mutilation and Tampering – There is clear evidence that court filings have been altered or withheld to prevent proper adjudication.
- Obstruction of Due Process – Deliberate delays and noncompliance with federal filing procedures violate plaintiffs’ constitutional right to a fair and impartial judicial process.
- Criminal Violations Under Federal Law – Willful suppression of court records constitutes obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505) and deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242).
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held that court clerks cannot refuse to file, alter, or tamper with documents, and any such actions are null and void from inception:
“Any ruling, order, or act by a court without jurisdiction is void ab initio.” — Valley v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348 (1920)
“Fraud vitiates everything it touches.” — United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878)
All Facts Are Now Admitted and Deemed True by Law
Under federal law and established precedent, the failure to rebut sworn affidavits or respond to the complaint results in an automatic admission of guilt. Since defendants have failed to contest any of the claims, all facts in the Verified Complaint stand as legally admitted and binding:
✅ Fraud, extortion, and deprivation of rights under color of law have been proven.
✅ Defendants are legally in default and dishonor under U.C.C. § 3-505.
✅ A $1,000,000,000,000.00 (One Trillion Dollar) judgment and lien against defendants is valid and enforceable.
This means that regardless of any attempts at concealment or obstruction by the clerk’s office, the lawsuit has already been lawfully established as binding and enforceable under commercial and constitutional law.
Next Steps: Legal Remedies Against the Clerk’s Office and Defendants
Since the clerk’s office is engaged in obstruction of justice, immediate legal action is warranted:
1. Demand for Immediate Docketing and Certification
- A formal written demand must be issued to the clerk, compelling immediate docketing.
- The chief judge of the district court must be notified of clerk misconduct.
2. Federal Criminal Complaints Against the Clerk
- Obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505) and tampering with public records (18 U.S.C. § 2071) are serious federal offenses.
- A criminal complaint must be filed with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the DOJ against the responsible individuals in the clerk’s office.
3. Injunctive Relief and Judicial Oversight
- A motion for injunctive relief must be filed to compel proper docketing.
- The court must be ordered to comply with federal law and refrain from any further obstruction.
4. Enforcement of Judgment Against Defendants
- Since all facts are legally admitted, the One Trillion Dollar judgment and lien must now be enforced.
- Seizure of assets and garnishment proceedings can begin against the named defendants.
Final Conclusion: The Court Must Act in Accordance with the Law
The deliberate obstruction by the clerk’s office in Riverside is a criminal act, designed to shield corrupt officials from accountability. However, under federal law, the failure to rebut sworn affidavits means all allegations are admitted and legally binding.
Since the Verified Complaint has already established the facts as true, the court is now obligated to enter judgment and enforce the lawful lien against the defendants.
The public must remain vigilant against judicial misconduct, corruption, and obstruction of justice. If the clerk’s office continues its criminal actions, it will only further expose the deep corruption within the system and reinforce the validity of the claims against the named defendants.
