The Kevin Walker Estate is set to escalate its legal battle against judicial misconduct, corruption, and procedural violations. If the Riverside Court fails to issue a lawful default and summary judgment in accordance with the unrebutted filings on record, the Estate has announced its intention to file a Notice of Judicial Fraud, Conspiracy, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, Violation of Due Process, and War Against the Constitution and the People on Monday, March 16, 2025.
The forthcoming notice details the court’s continued dishonor, its willful evasion of due process, and its participation in an unlawful conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Judicial Misconduct and Procedural Fraud Detailed in the Notice
The Kevin Walker Estate, WG Express Trust, and associated parties have lawfully placed the court on notice regarding:
Unrebutted Affidavits & Demands: Multiple affidavits and formal demands, including a Verified Conditional Acceptance and a Writ of Mandamus, remain uncontested, standing as prima facie truth under UCC § 3-505 (Evidence of Dishonor). Failure to Enter Judgment: Under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when no material fact is in dispute, summary judgment must be entered as a matter of law. The court has knowingly failed to comply. Violation of Constitutional & Commercial Law: The court is openly defying Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) (“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void”), the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2), and the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S., 318 U.S. 363 (1943)), which confirms that government actors engaged in commerce lose their immunity and are subject to the same commercial laws as private entities. Judicial Bad Faith & Collusion: Despite documented fraud, contract violations, and evidence supporting summary judgment, the court has continued to obstruct due process in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights) and 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law).
The Court’s Ongoing Violations: Willful Dishonor & Criminal Obstruction
The Riverside Court’s failure to act in accordance with established law amounts to deliberate judicial fraud and conspiracy. The PACER docket itself confirms the misconduct and refusal to enter judgment, despite multiple formal demands and legal filings.
The filed documents include:
Verified Affidavit in Support Notice of Filing Affidavit in Support Demand for Summary Judgment and Default Judgment Writ of Mandamus Verified Conditional Acceptance of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Notice of Decline of Consent to Be Heard by a Magistrate Judge
These remain legally uncontested, meaning they must be treated as final and binding under commercial law.
Remedy Sought: Immediate Judgment & Higher Court Intervention
If the court does not issue judgment by the deadline, the Kevin Walker Estate will:
File the Notice of Judicial Fraud to formally establish bad faith and procedural misconduct. Demand Recusal of the Presiding Judge for bias and willful failure to uphold the law. Petition for a Federal Investigation into violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 & 242 (Criminal conspiracy and deprivation of rights). Escalate the Matter to the United States Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and International Human Rights Bodies for relief and intervention.
Final Warning to the Court
Failure to issue judgment in accordance with the law will result in further legal action against all parties involved in judicial fraud, procedural obstruction, and deprivation of rights.
The Kevin Walker Estate stands firm in asserting its rights and enforcing all lawful remedies against a corrupt judiciary that refuses to follow the law.
The clock is ticking. The court must act lawfully or be held accountable.
