The Kevin Walker Estate has taken a significant legal stand against what it describes as judicial fraud and procedural obstruction within the United States District Court, Central District of California, Eastern Division. Despite the Plaintiffs’ Verified Notice of Judicial Fraud being filed and served, the court has refused to acknowledge it, further confirming allegations of misconduct and bad faith.
Obstruction of Key Legal Filings
A Verified Affidavit of Constitutional Authority, Supremacy Clause, American Sovereignty, Federal Jurisdiction, National/Non-Citizen National (State Citizen) Status, Estate Claim, and Rebuttal of All Legal Presumptions was submitted twice for filing. However, court personnel have obstructed and concealed this document from the record, in what appears to be an intentional violation of due process.
In addition, the PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED NOTICE OF JUDICIAL FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, AND WAR AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE has also been suppressed, despite being lawfully submitted and received.
These actions raise serious concerns that Judge Jesus Bernal and the Riverside Federal Court are knowingly engaging in fraudulent judicial procedures—a claim supported by the court’s failure to process legally binding documents while simultaneously pushing forward sham hearings that lack jurisdiction and lawful authority.
Sham Proceedings Without Jurisdiction
The scheduled hearing in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339 is in clear violation of established legal doctrines, including:
-
Res Judicata (matter already settled),
-
Stare Decisis (binding precedent),
-
Collateral Estoppel (preventing re-litigation), and
-
Unrebutted Affidavits that stand as truth in commerce and law.
Despite these principles barring any further proceedings, the court has not canceled the hearing, demonstrating a deliberate and knowing violation of due process.
Pacermonitor link: https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/56782287/Kevin_Walker_Estate_et_al_v_Jay_Promisco_et_al
Screen Shot 2025 03 22 at 6.10.18 PM
Fraudulent Actions Confirm the Government’s Unlawful Conduct
By concealing critical filings, obstructing due process, and moving forward with a non-consensual, unconstitutional hearing, the Riverside Federal Court is confirming the following:
✅ The government is knowingly committing judicial fraud and acting outside the law.
✅ The court is participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
✅ Proceedings are being conducted without jurisdiction or lawful authority.
✅ Any resulting orders, rulings, or judgments are void ab initio (null from inception).
The Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363) establishes that when the government operates in commerce, it is bound by commercial law and loses sovereign immunity. By refusing to uphold legal filings while still pursuing fraudulent proceedings, the court is engaging in corporate malfeasance and contract violations.
Legal Consequences and Next Steps
If the court does not cancel the hearing and issue the legally required summary judgment, it will be an admission of conspiracy, deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), and obstruction of justice.
The Kevin Walker Estate has made it clear that it will not participate in unconstitutional, sham proceedings and will escalate this matter to:
-
Federal appellate courts for immediate intervention.
-
The Department of Justice for criminal referrals.
-
Judicial oversight bodies for sanctions against Judge Jesus Bernal.
-
International human rights organizations for systemic due process violations.
Fraudulent Proceedings Rescheduled to 03/31/2025: A Clear Attempt to Prolong Judicial Fraud
Originally, the sham hearing in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339 was scheduled for March 24, 2025. However, rather than canceling the unauthorized, unconstitutional, and procedurally void proceeding, the court has now rescheduled the hearing to March 31, 2025. This action further confirms the court’s willful participation in fraud, conspiracy, and deprivation of rights under color of law.
This delay serves no lawful purpose but instead:
✅ Attempts to create the illusion of legitimate proceedings where none exist.
✅ Provides the court additional time to fabricate procedural justifications for its fraud.
✅ Obstructs and conceals the fact that summary judgment and default judgment are due as a matter of law.
✅ Forces the Plaintiffs into a never-ending cycle of litigation that violates due process and res judicata.
The Kevin Walker Estate has already provided unrebutted affidavits, a Verified Notice of Judicial Fraud, and demands for summary judgment, all of which legally and procedurally bar any further hearings or proceedings. Yet, rather than upholding its ministerial duty, the Riverside Federal Court and Judge Jesus Bernal are moving forward with clear intent to violate the law.
By rescheduling an already fraudulent hearing, the court has effectively admitted that it is participating in procedural bad faith, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy to violate Plaintiffs’ rights. If the court fails to immediately cancel this illegitimate hearing and issue summary judgment as required by law, it will serve as further evidence that the judiciary itself is engaged in willful criminal misconduct.
The Kevin Walker Estate will not participate in this fraudulent proceeding and will escalate this matter to higher courts, federal agencies, and judicial oversight committees to ensure that those responsible are held fully accountable under the law.
Conclusion: Fraud Cannot Stand in Law
The Riverside Federal Court’s refusal to docket key filings, coupled with its continued pursuit of an illegitimate hearing, exposes it as an agent of judicial fraud. Fraud vitiates everything it touches, and as case law has consistently affirmed (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61), any ruling based on fraud is void and unenforceable.
The Kevin Walker Estate demands immediate judicial accountability—and any further unlawful actions will be met with aggressive legal and federal enforcement measures.
