The 13th and 14th Amendments did not liberate the people — they reclassified them as corporate sureties and debt-collateral. This article exposes how the 14th was never lawfully ratified, how the 13th is repugnant to the Treaty of Ghent’s absolute ban on slavery, and how “minimum contacts” jurisdiction is coerced—not consensual. Under the Supremacy Clause, all such systems are void ab initio. The remedy is to rebut U.S. citizen presumptions, reject coerced jurisdiction, and reclaim standing as a living sovereign.
The 13th and 14th Amendments did not end slavery — they reinvented it. The 13th merely outlawed involuntary servitude, leaving voluntary contractual servitude intact, while the 14th created an entirely new class of federal “citizens of the United States” — statutory legal fictions (ens legis) owned by the corporate government. Through licenses, registrations, and signatures, living men and women are presumed to consent to act as sureties for these corporate entities, forfeiting their inherent rights for revocable privileges. Slavery wasn’t abolished — it was rebranded as citizenship.
Private Citizen – is someone who is private and not governed by any de facto corporation like the U.S. […]
Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868: A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is […]
Article III, Section 2, Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under […]
Download Copy. 829 Case No. 14,459. 24FED.CAS.—53 UNITED STATES V. ANTHONY. [11 Blatchf. 200; 5 Chi. Leg. News. 462, 493; […]