This article exposes the undeniable legal framework: the United States is a Federal corporation, and the “U.S. citizen” is a business franchise created under that corporate system. Statutes and case law confirm that the Social Security number belongs only to the franchise — not to the private man or woman. Compelling disclosure or use of an SSN outside of employment or tax purposes is a felony under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8). From the Buck Act to Kitchens v. Steele, the record is clear: forcing SSNs in private contracts is unlawful coercion into a federal franchise.
Contracts, legally binding agreements between parties, are often formed through mutual consent, typically involving an offer and acceptance. Silence, known as tacit agreement, acquiescence, or tacit procuration, can also legally bind parties to contract terms. This concept becomes vital when challenging purported fraudulent loans like mortgages. Through the strategic use of commercial affidavits, one can utilize contract law principles such as the mailbox rule, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and relevant statutes to enforce or modify contract terms. However, it is equally important to recognize that using Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) for debt payment may be interpreted as tacit acceptance of the contract’s terms, potentially resulting in the abandonment of one’s assets and exemptions. This action may further expose the purported borrower to legal risks under federal law.