In the American republic, no man or woman can be lawfully punished for a victimless crime where no injury, harm, or contract exists. This article breaks down how statutes and administrative codes are often used to presume jurisdiction without consent, violating fundamental rights. It discusses the right not to contract, the doctrine of corpus delicti, and the legal consequences of color of law enforcement.
Many individuals are unaware that a W-2 form may function as an implied gift contract, classifying wages as voluntary transfers under IRS gift and estate tax rules. By signing a W-4, employees unknowingly authorize their earnings to be withheld and presumed as taxable income, potentially falling under estate and wealth transfer taxation per 26 U.S.C. § 2501 and § 2511. This article explores how W-2 wages align with Class 2 and Class 5 gift tax classifications, the silent trust relationship created by voluntary withholding, and how to rebut the presumption that earnings were gifted into the tax system. Understanding this hidden legal framework is essential for asserting proper tax classification and protecting your income.
"Under the color of law" refers to actions taken by government Officials or Agents that appear to be within the bounds of their lawful authority but are, in fact, abuses of power or violations of an private citizen/non-citizen national‘s constitutional rights. This phrase is often used in legal contexts to describe situations where "law enforcement Officers" or other public officials misuse their positions to commit unlawful acts of injustice and/or or discrimination, such as unlawful arrests, excessive force, unlawful and illegal foreclosures (since all foreclosures are fraud since Executive Order 6102 and House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, public law 73-10), unlawful repossessions/thefts, or illegal searches and seizures.
In the realm of financial obligations, there is a fundamental principle that separates the tangible from the intangible, the government-created […]