In a blatant and escalating violation of federal law, multiple state actors and court officers in Riverside County, California, are engaged in criminal obstruction, fraud, and a coordinated RICO enterprise designed to suppress constitutional rights, retaliate against whistleblowers, and unlawfully retain jurisdiction that was stripped by operation of law.
This case — originally filed as MISW2501134 in Riverside County Superior Court — has exposed deep systemic corruption, illegal coordination among unlicensed judicial agents, and willful denial of federal jurisdiction after lawful removal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1443, 1446(d), and 1331.
The Facts Are Undeniable
On May 9, 2025, a Verified Notice of Removal was executed and served by Registered Mail, with full delivery confirmed to both:
-
The State Court (Superior Court, Southwest Justice Center)
-
The Federal Court (U.S. District Court, Central District of California)
Tracking and signed delivery receipts confirm receipt by both courts on May 12, 2025. This meets the statutory threshold under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), which provides:
“…filing of such notice with the clerk of such State court… shall effect the removal and the State court shall proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded.”
Yet instead of acknowledging this lawful divestment of jurisdiction, the Riverside Superior Court fraudulently docketed the removal as a vague “letter received,” deliberately mislabeling the filing to avoid triggering the mandatory jurisdictional stay.
The Criminal Players
The removal was prompted in part by ongoing constitutional violations and procedural fraud committed by:
-
Jeremiah Raxter – acting as “commissioner” with a known inactive California State Bar license (Bar #276811), disqualifying him from performing any judicial or prosecutorial function.
-
Charles Rogers – also operating unlawfully under the title of “commissioner” with a revoked/inactive Bar license (Bar #64530), similarly disqualified.
-
Monika Vermani – Deputy District Attorney actively participating in fraud and retaliation while ignoring federal notices and verified affidavits on record.
Each of these individuals has continued to act under color of law, with full knowledge of their own disqualification and the pending federal removal — a pattern that amounts to criminal impersonation, fraud, and civil rights obstruction.
See Related: “Public Notice of Criminal Enterprise, RICO Violations, and Systematic Fraud Committed by Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani in Riverside County”
Public Notice of Criminal Enterprise, RICO Violations, and Systematic Fraud Committed by Charles Rogers, Jeremiah D. Raxter, and Monika Vermani in Riverside County
Federal Court Complicity
Compounding the obstruction, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has yet to docket the Verified Notice of Removal, despite confirmed receipt.
This creates an unlawful limbo, allowing the state court to proceed in defiance of federal supremacy. This failure is not clerical — it is a form of administrative fraud and suppression of jurisdiction. By law, the federal court holds exclusive jurisdiction the moment removal is executed.
The RICO Pattern
The Verified Notice of Removal clearly documents predicate acts under:
-
18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy against rights
-
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law
-
18 U.S.C. § 1341 / 1343 – Mail and wire fraud
-
18 U.S.C. § 872 – Extortion under color of official right
-
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – False statements
-
18 U.S.C. § 1512 / 1513 – Witness tampering and retaliation
-
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1964 – Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
This isn’t mere misconduct — it’s organized crime in robes and badges, executed through collusion between unauthorized judicial officers, prosecutors, and federal clerks. The silence is not neutral — it’s complicity.
🚨 Federal Court Obstruction Is a Pattern, Not an Exception
What’s happening in the current matter isn’t an isolated event — it’s part of a documented pattern of obstruction, record tampering, and judicial fraud emanating from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California – Riverside Division. That same court is already under formal notice and investigation for serious procedural violations in Case No. 5:25-cv-00339-JGB, presided over by Judge Jesus G. Bernal.
In that matter, multiple verified affidavits and motions were:
-
Filed and served via Registered Mail, with tracking and green card confirmations;
-
Never docketed, intentionally concealed by court clerks;
-
Falsely stated to have never been filed, despite physical and electronic proof;
-
And unlawfully dismissed without due process.
The plaintiffs in that case filed a Verified Notice of Appeal and Formal Notice of Procedural Errors, Record Tampering, and Judicial Misconduct, establishing:
-
Docket tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512, 2071;
-
Concealment of conditional acceptances, default motions, and constitutional affidavits;
-
Defamation and bias from the bench, including labeling lawful filings as “sovereign citizen theories” — a known slur used to justify procedural sabotage.
This proves that the Riverside Division of the U.S. District Court has developed a systemic practice of ignoring, suppressing, and obstructing federal filings, especially when they involve:
-
Private trust law,
-
UCC enforcement,
-
Estate claims, or
-
Constitutional standing beyond the fictitious U.S. citizen jurisdiction.
In light of this, the court’s refusal to docket the Verified Notice of Removal filed on May 9, 2025 in the case against Jeremiah Raxter, Monika Vermani, and Charles Rogers is not an anomaly — it is business as usual for a compromised forum already under exposure.
If corruption exists at the state level, it is only enabled and protected by collusion at the federal level. The system is eating itself — and the evidence is now beyond dispute.
See Related: “Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law“
Confirmed Judicial Fraud and Conspiracy: Judge Jesus G. Bernal Conceals Affidavit, Notice, and Conditional Acceptance, and Dismisses Case In Chambers Under Color of Law
Conclusion: The System Is Cornered
The court system in Riverside has been caught red-handed — mislabeling lawful federal filings, ignoring jurisdictional divestment, and operating under color of authority with invalid licenses and fraudulent conduct.
The next steps will include:
-
Filing a Motion to Compel Federal Docketing
-
Filing Notices of Default and Judicial Dishonor
-
Commercial liens and bond claims against all actors
-
Filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Complaint in federal court
-
Pursuing criminal complaints under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241–242 and 1341–1964
Final Word
This is not just about one case. This is about a broken system protecting itself through silence, fraud, and procedural evasion. The Constitution does not allow it — and now the record proves it.
