In what is no longer an anomaly but a predictable manifestation of institutionalized corruption, the federal judiciary in California has once again revealed its true nature — not as a forum for justice, but as a shield for lawlessness and a tool of administrative tyranny.

The latest example: Kevin Realworldfare, Executor of the KEVIN WALKER ESTATE v. Chad Bianco, et al. Despite filing a Verified Complaint, supported by unrebutted affidavits, documentary proof of constitutional violations, and a legally grounded Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Judge Wesley L. Hsu and Magistrate Maria Audero denied the motion using a procedural pretext so thin it amounts to judicial dishonesty.

Their primary excuse? “Lack of notice.” Yet Plaintiff provided Registered Mail service with Form 3811 return receipts — recognized under federal law as legally sufficient notice. The Court ignored this and instead clung to a superficial claim that notice was mailed “the same day” the motion was filed. This is not impartial adjudication. This is technical evasion to avoid adjudicating verified constitutional claims.

And if that wasn’t enough, Judge Hsu took the extraordinary step of slandering the Plaintiff’s legal status, referring to the verified civil rights and trust law claims as “sovereign citizen rhetoric” — invoking United States v. Benabe, a criminal case involving incoherent pseudo-legal defenses that has no bearing on verified civil litigation under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986, and constitutional torts.

Judge Hsu also blatantly mischaracterized Kevin: Realworldfare as a “resident”, despite Kevin’s explicit declaration and filed evidence to the contrary. This false presumption has been expressly rebutted by the Plaintiff’s sworn and unrebutted filing, titled: “VERIFIED Affidavit of Constitutional Authority, RESERVATION OF RIGHTS, Supremacy Clause, American Sovereignty, Federal Jurisdiction, National/Non-Citizen National (State Citizen) Status, Estate Claim, MINIMUM CONTACTS, and Rebuttal of All Presumptions” — docketed as Document #17. The court’s continued use of that label constitutes willful fraud and intentional defamation of status.

This move was not just erroneous — it was prejudicial, defamatory, and an act of judicial sabotage. It is a war against the Constitution, and a betrayal of every principle of due process, equity, and justice.

Kevin: Realworldfare Strikes Back

In direct response to this unlawful and defective denial, Kevin: Realworldfare has filed a Verified Motion and Demand for Reconsideration, coupled with Judicial Notice of Bias and a Demand to Vacate the tainted order.

This motion shreds the Court’s rationale, establishes the sufficiency of notice via Registered Mail, rebuts the false “sovereign citizen” labeling, and meticulously demonstrates that all four Winter factors for injunctive relief were met. The unrebutted affidavits, the record of ongoing constitutional violations, and the balance of equities unquestionably favor the Plaintiff.

If Judges Wesley Hsu and Maria Audero fail to reverse the order, they move beyond mere negligence into active conspiracy, joining the ranks of already-exposed judicial figures like Judge Jesus G. Bernal — known for record suppression and procedural tampering. This is not legal oversight. It is a coordinated assault on federal jurisdiction, constitutional rights, and lawful remedy.

DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT

The California Federal Courts: A Systemic Criminal Enterprise?

The Realworldfare matter is not isolated. It is part of a broader, undeniable pattern of fraud, delay, deflection, and systemic sabotage across California’s federal courts. Courts are no longer adjudicating claims — they are filtering, censoring, suppressing, and obstructing them, particularly those involving:

• Trust law
• Private estate claims
• UCC enforcement
• Civil rights violations
• Non-corporate, non-U.S. citizen claimants

There is no justice here. Only ritual theater designed to exhaust, demoralize, and neutralize.

The Real Path to Remedy

When the courts refuse to rule lawfully, the People are not without power. The following remain the only viable enforcement routes:

• UCC-1 and UCC-3 filings asserting liens and perfected security interests;
• Commercial lien enforcement against judicial bonds and insurance;
• Criminal complaints under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1512, 1001, and RICO § 1962;
• Judicial misconduct complaints filed under 28 U.S.C. § 351;
• Public notice campaigns and verified publication of court fraud;
• Affidavits of truth and lawful people’s enforcement of unrebutted claims.

The courts are not broken — they are working exactly as designed for the corporate State. It is now up to the secured, private, and sovereign-minded to reclaim jurisdiction, record their claims, and enforce commercial liability on every agent acting in dishonor.

Final Word

The denial of relief in Kevin Walker Estate v. Chad Bianco is not a misunderstanding. It is not procedural oversight. It is the manifestation of a corrupt court system defending corrupt officials, obstructing lawful remedy, and slandering those who assert their rights.

This is not “justice delayed.” It is justice denied by design.

If the federal judiciary in California continues to operate in this manner, the People are right to treat it as null and void. The Constitution is not dead — but those sworn to uphold it are actively warring against it.

We do not beg these actors for justice.

We record, perfect, lien, and expose.

If the courts won’t enforce the law — the People will.