The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals now finds itself at the epicenter of a growing constitutional scandal—one involving fraudulent dismissal, unlawful mandate enforcement, systemic judicial obstruction, and willful defiance of the United States Constitution. The target? Kevin: Realworldfare, a private living man proceeding sui juris, fiduciary, and secured party for a lawfully formed private trust and estate. The charge? He dared to invoke his inalienable right to access justice without hiring a BAR-licensed actor of the corporate legal monopoly.
🔥 A VERIFIED CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE NOW FILED
In response, Kevin: Realworldfare has filed a Verified Constitutional Challenge, now on record in both district and appellate dockets.
This is no casual filing. It is a fact-based, affidavit-backed, constitutionally grounded demand to:
-
Vacate the void mandate issued without jurisdiction or merit;
-
Reinstate the appeal as a matter of right;
-
Declare that private, non-statutory trusts and estates are not corporate fictions and may access courts directly through their fiduciaries;
-
Expose and terminate the policy-based discrimination against living men who refuse BAR interference.
The challenge cites Marbury v. Madison, Faretta v. California, Boddie v. Connecticut, and Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., making clear that the courts may not subordinate the Constitution to internal preference, economic gatekeeping, or administrative avoidance.
🎭 FRAUD BEGAN WITH BERNAL — AND THE COVERUP CONTINUES UP THE LADDER
This collapse of judicial legitimacy began when District Judge Jesus G. Bernal unilaterally dismissed Kevin’s properly filed case—not for lack of jurisdiction, not for failure to state a claim, not even on motion by any party—but based solely on a clerical belief that a private man, acting as fiduciary for a private trust, could not appear without BAR-licensed representation.
But worse—Bernal flat-out lied in the public record.
He falsely claimed that Kevin failed to respond to the Court’s directive.
In reality, Kevin: Realworldfare timely filed a Verified Conditional Acceptance, lawfully challenging the unconstitutional demand for licensed counsel and placing the court on notice of jurisdictional and procedural fraud.
This wasn’t a mistake.
It was a willful suppression of the record, fraudulent concealment of filings, and a knowing act of judicial deception.
There was:
-
No hearing
-
No factual review of the record
-
No consideration of the Verified Affidavits
-
No application of 28 U.S.C. § 1654 or Federal Rule 17
Just silence, followed by a fraudulent and void dismissal designed to avoid adjudication, conceal the truth, and protect a collapsing jurisdictional scheme.
That’s not judicial discretion.
That’s ultra vires action, procedural fraud, and a direct violation of Article III, the First and Fifth Amendments, and the judge’s constitutional oath.
Judge Bernal’s actions set into motion a judicial coverup now echoed by the Ninth Circuit—who, rather than correct the fraud, is actively aiding and abetting it under color of law.
1. VERIFIED Affidavit of Constitutional Authority, Supremacy Clause, American Sovereignty, Federal Jurisdiction, National/Non-Citizen National (State Citizen) Status, Estate Claim, and Rebuttal of All Legal Presumptions
This affidavit lawfully rebutted all presumptions of statutory jurisdiction, clarified the Plaintiffs’ status as American Nationals and State Citizens—not 14th Amendment federal citizens—and invoked authority under the Supremacy Clause (Art. VI), Title 8, and other federal jurisdictional limits.
2. PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF DEFENDANT PHH MORTGAGE’S NOTICE OF MOTION, MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT, SANCTIONS, AND PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED DEMAND FOR DEFAULT AND SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, AS A MATTER OF LAW, WITHOUT HEARING
This filing conditionally accepted Defendant’s motion under the law of contracts and demanded relief due to the Defendant’s failure to provide material rebuttals to the Plaintiffs’ verified claims. It included demands for sanctions, default, and summary judgment pursuant to unrebutted affidavits and Rule 56.
3. PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED NOTICE OF JUDICIAL FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, AND WAR AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE
This was a direct notice to the court and record of alleged acts of misconduct, fraud, and conspiracy, including the failure to address previously submitted material, evidence of color of law activity, and a judicial war on constitutional process and trust-based claims.
All three documents were concealed from the public record.
🏛️ THE NINTH CIRCUIT: SUPPRESSING JUSTICE, ENFORCING FICTION
Rather than correct the manifest fraud committed in the lower court, the Ninth Circuit doubled down, issuing a void mandate that pretends Kevin’s appeal lacks merit solely because he would not surrender to BAR association coercion.
Let that sink in:
⚠️ The Ninth Circuit—charged with safeguarding federal rights—is actively denying a living man access to Article III courts because he refuses to hire a licensed corporate intermediary.
This is a direct violation of:
-
Article III, Section 2 – requiring courts to hear all cases in law and equity;
-
The First Amendment – right to petition and freedom of association;
-
The Fifth Amendment – right to due process;
-
28 U.S.C. § 1654 – explicitly authorizing any party to “plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel”;
-
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a) – which mandates that actions be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.
Yet the Ninth Circuit ignored all of it—and instead enforced policy masquerading as law.
🚨 SYSTEMATIC CONCEALMENT IS A CRIME, NOT A POLICY
Let’s be clear:
The refusal to docket, hear, or address constitutional claims is not a procedural error—it is fraud.
It is obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1505,
conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241,
and deprivation of rights under color of law under 18 U.S.C. § 242.
Every judge and clerk who has participated in the suppression of Kevin’s verified filings is now on judicial notice of their personal liability.
The courts exist to dispense law, not protect a rigged monopoly or corporate guild.
The Constitution is not optional.
Due process is not subject to a clerk’s discretion.
And equity does not surrender to policy.
📜 HISTORY WILL REMEMBER WHO STOOD, AND WHO CONCEALED
Kevin: Realworldfare has done what few have the courage or knowledge to do:
Stand sui juris in equity, defend his trust without surrendering to corporate representation, and challenge the entire foundation of judicial obstruction rooted in fraud.
If the Ninth Circuit continues to suppress, delay, or reject this challenge, it confirms what many already suspect:
⚖️ The judiciary is no longer a forum of law, but an administrative barrier used to enforce the will of the BAR, deny redress to private Americans, and protect its own procedural misconduct.
Let this article serve as public record:
The Ninth Circuit is now on notice of its own violations, its own complicity, and the awakening of a lawful constitutional remedy in motion.
Silence now equals dishonor. Injustice will be enforced.
