Riverside Federal Court Exposed: Judicial Fraud Confirmed in Kevin Walker Estate vs. Jay Promisco, as Sham Unconstitutional Hearing is Scheduled for March 24, 2025

Rather than fulfilling its ministerial duty to issue summary judgment and default judgment as required by law, the court has chosen to perpetuate fraudulent proceedings, violating due process, commercial law, and constitutional protections.

Court’s Failure to Act Confirms Judicial Conspiracy

Despite having clear legal obligations, the Riverside Court has ignored its ministerial duty and proceeded with fraudulent hearings, proving a deliberate violation of due process and obstruction of justice. The Notice of Judicial Fraud highlights the following key legal violations:

1. Unrebutted Affidavits Stand as Truth in Commerce

• The court was properly served with multiple sworn affidavits that remain unrebutted, making them legally binding as truth under Maxims of Law and UCC § 3-505 (Evidence of Dishonor).
• By proceeding in contradiction to established commercial law, the court itself is now in dishonor and committing judicial misconduct.

2. Summary Judgment is Required as a Matter of Law

• Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 56 mandates summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists.
• Defendants have failed to lawfully respond, leaving no triable issue—yet the court continues to obstruct justice instead of fulfilling its legal obligation.

3. Ministerial Duty to Enter Judgment

• The filing of default judgment is not discretionary—it is a ministerial act that must be executed under the law.
• The court’s refusal to enter judgment constitutes obstruction of justice and a breach of public trust.

4. Fraud Vitiates Everything—Court’s Orders Are Void Ab Initio

By ignoring the Notice of Judicial Fraud, the court has confirmed its own fraudulent and unconstitutional activity. Under United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878):

“Fraud vitiates everything it touches.”

Any order, ruling, or judgment issued under fraudulent circumstances is automatically null and void from inception (void ab initio) and carries no legal force.

5. Government’s Own Acknowledgment of Fraud

• The court’s refusal to strike fraudulent filings and failure to dismiss void claims confirm that it is actively conspiring against the People’s rights.
• Under 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights) and 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law), any judge, clerk, or official participating in these unlawful proceedings is engaging in criminal misconduct.

Fraudulent Hearings and Unlawful Orders Have No Legal Standing

If the Riverside Court does not cancel the fraudulent hearing and issue the legally required summary judgment, it confirms:

1️⃣ The judicial system is knowingly engaged in fraud and conspiracy.
2️⃣ The court is willfully depriving Plaintiffs of their rights under color of law.
3️⃣ Any ruling, order, or judgment issued is null, void, and unenforceable.
4️⃣ Every court official involved may be subject to civil and criminal liability.

Key Legal Precedents Supporting Judicial Fraud and Obstruction of Justice

• Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943) – When the government operates in commerce, it is bound by commercial law and cannot arbitrarily exercise sovereign immunity.

• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) – “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” Any act by the court that contradicts constitutional protections is automatically void.

• Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) – A public official engaging in unconstitutional acts loses any immunity and may be sued in their individual capacity.

• Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252 (1959) – Denying access to the courts via fraudulent obstruction is a violation of due process.

Kevin Walker Estate Will Not Participate in Fraudulent Proceedings

The Kevin Walker Estate has made it clear that it will not participate in unconstitutional, unauthorized, and fraudulent proceedings. Any further attempt by the court to push forward with this sham hearing is an act of treason against the Constitution and the People.

Should the Riverside Court fail to correct its unlawful actions immediately, the Kevin Walker Estate will escalate this matter to higher courts, federal agencies, and criminal oversight bodies, demanding:

1️⃣ Immediate federal intervention for judicial misconduct.
2️⃣ Sanctions against all individuals involved in the fraud.
3️⃣ Criminal referrals under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242.
4️⃣ Formal legal action against the court for deprivation of rights under color of law.

Conclusion: The Government Has No Excuse for Fraud

By ignoring the Notice of Judicial Fraud and refusing to cancel the sham hearing, the Riverside Court is openly admitting that it is part of a fraudulent system designed to railroad Plaintiffs and deny them justice.

The people are Watching.

History Will Record Whether This Court Upholds the Law or Exposes Itself as a Corrupt, Illegitimate Entity.

The  Plaintiffs (Kevin Walker Estate, et al.) demand justice, accountability, and the immediate enforcement of the law—anything less is a criminal conspiracy against the People.