Every court case in the United States is monetized through bid, performance, and payment bonds, converted into securities under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042 and invested through CRIS with CUSIP identifiers. By law, 12 U.S.C. § 411 confirms Federal Reserve notes are obligations of the United States, while 18 U.S.C. § 8 defines bonds, notes, and securities as “obligations or other securities of the United States.” Asserting status as real party in interest and secured party creditor is essential, because under UCC § 9-315(a)(1), a perfected security interest continues in collateral despite any transfer or disposition. Judges and clerks, acting as corporate sureties under 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, conceal financial conflicts requiring disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455. Since 1933, all obligations have been discharged in credit, making courtrooms bonded, securitized, and monetized enterprises — unless the secured party reclaims the funds.
This article exposes the undeniable legal framework: the United States is a Federal corporation, and the “U.S. citizen” is a business franchise created under that corporate system. Statutes and case law confirm that the Social Security number belongs only to the franchise — not to the private man or woman. Compelling disclosure or use of an SSN outside of employment or tax purposes is a felony under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8). From the Buck Act to Kitchens v. Steele, the record is clear: forcing SSNs in private contracts is unlawful coercion into a federal franchise.
The 13th and 14th Amendments did not liberate the people — they reclassified them as corporate sureties and debt-collateral. This article exposes how the 14th was never lawfully ratified, how the 13th is repugnant to the Treaty of Ghent’s absolute ban on slavery, and how “minimum contacts” jurisdiction is coerced—not consensual. Under the Supremacy Clause, all such systems are void ab initio. The remedy is to rebut U.S. citizen presumptions, reject coerced jurisdiction, and reclaim standing as a living sovereign.
The 13th and 14th Amendments did not end slavery — they reinvented it. The 13th merely outlawed involuntary servitude, leaving voluntary contractual servitude intact, while the 14th created an entirely new class of federal “citizens of the United States” — statutory legal fictions (ens legis) owned by the corporate government. Through licenses, registrations, and signatures, living men and women are presumed to consent to act as sureties for these corporate entities, forfeiting their inherent rights for revocable privileges. Slavery wasn’t abolished — it was rebranded as citizenship.
Judges are not immune when they act outside lawful jurisdiction. Under the Clearfield Doctrine (Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, […]
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) codifies due process by requiring notice, opportunity to respond, and a final record before rights or property can be touched. Anchored by the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, the APA reflects both constitutional and statutory safeguards. In commerce and trust law, unrebutted affidavits operate under the same principle: silence equals acquiescence, and the record stands as truth. Attempts to criminalize or intimidate lawful administrative procedure are themselves unlawful, void, and retaliatory.
This article exposes the hidden monetary system operating beneath the courts, where every case generates bonds and securities deposited into CRIS accounts and monetized through Treasury and Federal Reserve channels. It explains how statutes like 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041–2042, 31 U.S.C. §§ 9301–9309, 12 U.S.C. §§ 411–412, and UCC Articles 3 & 9 prove the existence of court-generated securities and fiduciary duties of disclosure. The piece traces the shift from gold and silver to credit after HJR-192 of 1933 public law 73-10(31 U.S.C. § 5118) and shows why claims for accounting and release are often dismissed as “frivolous” to conceal fraud. Ultimately, it demonstrates how law supports the Real Party in Interest asserting perfected secured claims against hidden trust assets and bonded instruments.
Every State operates as a corporation—its Constitution is the charter, its House and Senate act as the board of directors, and its statutes function as bylaws. Citizens are treated as franchise participants through licenses, registrations, and contracts, while States issue bonds and securitize debt like any other business. This hidden corporate structure reveals the true commercial character of “government.” Learn more at Realworldfare.com.
The Declaration of Independence is not just patriotic history — it is a signed, binding contract and trust agreement. It establishes government as trustee, the people as beneficiaries, and unalienable rights as the trust corpus to be secured. Unlike later constitutional language about “citizens,” the Declaration protects men and women directly, as living beings endowed by their Creator with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It remains organic law and superior authority, giving the people both the right and the duty to resist and abolish any government that breaches its trust.
A properly executed Security Agreement assigning all assets, rights, and interests to a private trust—paired with a UCC-1 financing statement and UCC-3 amendment claiming the Deed of Trust and Note—lawfully establishes the trust as the secured party and real party in interest. This perfected interest, under UCC §§ 9-203, 9-509, 3-301, and supported by controlling case law (e.g., Carpenter v. Longan, Ibanez, Veal), strips any servicer or third-party of standing to foreclose unless they possess the original Note, prove an unbroken chain of title, and rebut the trust’s perfected claim. Without that, all foreclosure attempts become void ab initio, commercial dishonor, and legal trespass on private trust property.
This article exposes the deliberate design behind California’s judicial corruption, focusing on how courts enable foreclosure fraud and obstruct lawful remedy to protect financial interests. It outlines the deep ties between judges, public pensions, and mortgage-backed securities, explaining how systemic bias against pro se litigants and equity claims maintains a rigged foreclosure racket. From fraudulent trustees’ deeds to administrative sabotage, California courts serve revenue and institutional protection—not justice. The piece makes clear that equity, truth, and due process are casualties of a machine built to seize assets, not resolve claims.
This article exposes verified judicial misconduct by U.S. District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato in the federal civil rights case Kevin Realworldfare et al. v. Tamara Wagner et al. Despite a verified motion for disqualification filed under 28 U.S.C. § 144, Judge Kato continued to rule without jurisdiction—rendering all subsequent actions void ab initio. Plaintiffs allege Kato deliberately misrepresented the law, falsely claiming an affidavit was required despite Ninth Circuit precedent confirming that a verified motion suffices. Meanwhile, state commissioner Tamara Wagner—whose jurisdiction ceased on April 28, 2025, upon federal removal—continued to obstruct access to remedy, deny motions, and execute dispossession orders without lawful authority. Rather than uphold federal supremacy and equity, Kato has doubled down on the fraud, sustaining ultra vires state actions under color of law. Plaintiffs demand her immediate disqualification, vacatur of all rulings, and reassignment to restore judicial integrity.