What began as freedom under Natural Law has been hijacked by statutes, attorneys, and codification into a corporate empire. The Great Overlay dismantles the illusion of justice by showing how BAR-run courts reduce men and women to incompetent wards while enforcing color of law. This is a devastating breakdown of the fraud behind “U.S. citizenship” and the unlawful corporate overlay that replaced the republic.
The estate is king — the original jurisdiction that cannot be abolished, erased, or subordinated. Trusts, whether statutory, express, common law, or non-statutory, are merely tools and wrappers layered on top of the estate, never the foundation. EINs (98 for foreign trusts, 99 for foreign estates) are only administrative tags; they do not collapse or redefine your estate unless you misclassify and consent. Forms like 1041, 3520, and 1120-F are not chains but instruments — used wrong, they prove servitude; used strategically, they enforce equity and return credits. Jurisdiction is never taken; it is given — estate or fiction, sovereignty or slavery, remedy or ruin
This article exposes the undeniable legal framework: the United States is a Federal corporation, and the “U.S. citizen” is a business franchise created under that corporate system. Statutes and case law confirm that the Social Security number belongs only to the franchise — not to the private man or woman. Compelling disclosure or use of an SSN outside of employment or tax purposes is a felony under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8). From the Buck Act to Kitchens v. Steele, the record is clear: forcing SSNs in private contracts is unlawful coercion into a federal franchise.
The 13th and 14th Amendments did not liberate the people — they reclassified them as corporate sureties and debt-collateral. This article exposes how the 14th was never lawfully ratified, how the 13th is repugnant to the Treaty of Ghent’s absolute ban on slavery, and how “minimum contacts” jurisdiction is coerced—not consensual. Under the Supremacy Clause, all such systems are void ab initio. The remedy is to rebut U.S. citizen presumptions, reject coerced jurisdiction, and reclaim standing as a living sovereign.
The 13th and 14th Amendments did not end slavery — they reinvented it. The 13th merely outlawed involuntary servitude, leaving voluntary contractual servitude intact, while the 14th created an entirely new class of federal “citizens of the United States” — statutory legal fictions (ens legis) owned by the corporate government. Through licenses, registrations, and signatures, living men and women are presumed to consent to act as sureties for these corporate entities, forfeiting their inherent rights for revocable privileges. Slavery wasn’t abolished — it was rebranded as citizenship.
Discover the shocking truth behind America’s hidden transformation. Why There Have Been No True Article III Judges Since 1989 exposes how the Judicial Improvements Act quietly dismantled constitutional courts and replaced them with corporate administrative tribunals. Judges who were once independent arbiters of law are now statutory employees enforcing policy—not the Constitution. This report traces the bait-and-switch that erased judicial power, stripped due process, and left every American at the mercy of a corporate trust system masquerading as justice. A must-read for anyone seeking to understand why real law no longer exists in U.S. courts.
Most Americans don’t realize the U.S. government removed real money in 1933 — but also gave the people a powerful remedy: the right to discharge debt through lawful assignment. Under 31 U.S.C. § 3123 and 5118, private Americans can tender value and assign obligations to the Treasury for dollar-for-dollar discharge, using the same credit-based system banks rely on daily. This isn’t fringe theory — it’s codified law, commercial equity, and constitutional remedy in action. By properly perfecting interest, assigning the debt, and documenting the discharge, you not only resolve your own claims, but reduce the national debt and restore balance. The only thing missing? The knowledge that it was always your lawful right to begin with.
Compelling someone to provide their Social Security Number (SSN) is a federal felony under 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(8). Learn how the law protects your right to withhold your SSN and how the Privacy Act mandates full disclosure before it can be requested. Court rulings confirm your privacy rights — and even the FBI admits that Credit Privacy Numbers (CPNs) are legal alternatives. Discover how you can use a W-8BEN, foreign trust, or CPN to legally opt out of the W-4/W-2 system.
An Article III court provides essential protections in civil contract disputes involving unrebutted affidavits. It ensures due process, enforces uncontested evidence, and offers both legal and equitable remedies. With exclusive equity jurisdiction, these courts can compel performance, issue injunctions, and affirm binding agreements, safeguarding constitutional rights and justice.
In a groundbreaking legal maneuver grounded in contract law, Kevin Walker, acting as Plaintiff and Attorney-in-Fact for the ™KEVIN WALKER© ESTATE, has officially filed a Notice of Default against the California Highway Patrol (CHP), the State of California, and the Riverside County Sheriff. The filing alleges a breach of contractual obligations under common law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and constitutional protections, demanding accountability for actions the Plaintiffs claim were unlawful and coercive.
At the center of the dispute is Ticket #7W50000TL, which the Plaintiffs affirm, via an unrebutted commercial affidavit, constitutes a fraudulent and coercive offer presented without valid consent. The Notice of Default demands an initial payment of $100,000,000.00 USD, escalating to $900,000,000,000.00 USD in total liability should the Defendants fail to fulfill their contractual obligations and respond in accordance with the terms outlined in the conditional acceptance agreement
When a judge takes an unreasonably long time to decide a case, there are numerous actions available to address the situation, including some uncommon or unconventional strategies. These options range from standard procedural remedies to extraordinary measures, depending on the extent of the delay and the governing jurisdiction. The following is a detailed list of potential solutions